Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vdo3u4$4q92$6@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Does Dimdows Know What Time It Is? Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 07:02:28 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 16 Message-ID: <vdo3u4$4q92$6@dont-email.me> References: <hwmKO.36384$afc4.11514@fx42.iad> <vddgqf$24oap$1@dont-email.me> <bfyKO.37639$afc4.24519@fx42.iad> <vdg0pn$2k2ps$1@dont-email.me> <bmSKO.243830$v8v2.80772@fx18.iad> <pan$c95bb$cbe518b0$39a1d215$2736670b@linux.rocks> <vdhmn3$2sase$2@dont-email.me> <t41LO.34727$rIH3.25125@fx40.iad> <vdje0h$37qau$3@dont-email.me> <gfbLO.276631$FzW1.145242@fx14.iad> <vdjgsm$37qau$9@dont-email.me> <xLbLO.69482$2nv5.49161@fx39.iad> <vdm399$3nim2$1@dont-email.me> <5txLO.77672$S9Vb.14643@fx45.iad> <j96ufjtp5rtnbhutj0aaetgph9t4k07ei3@4ax.com> <lm9ae2Frnk8U2@mid.individual.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2024 09:02:28 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="53e6a1f358fb9450cb41203dd8d281a9"; logging-data="157986"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19TSk5Txt9jCsapdggxLsXa" User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:NgYM+SbnWWTuV1NgEkCIdXQKoJk= Bytes: 2213 On 4 Oct 2024 04:49:06 GMT, rbowman wrote: > On Thu, 03 Oct 2024 17:27:33 -0500, chrisv wrote: > >> Even in the FOSS community, people who think like Stallman are a tiny >> minority. > > If you look at the newer projects you'll see MIT, BSD, Apache, and other > permissive licenses, not GPL3. Some have wording like 'if you really > want to consider it lgpl feel free.' I think Wall was one of the first > to do that with his Poetic License. I’m not sure about the legalities of dual-licensing. If you look at licences like the GPL, they have wording that says “if you don’t accept this licence, then you don’t have permission to use the software”. That kind of precludes getting that permission via an alternative licence ...