Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Luke A. Guest" <laguest@archeia.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ironclad, the hard-Real Time capable POSIX-like kernel written in
 SPARK/Ada, received an nlnet grant
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 23:19:09 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <vdppkt$cvud$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vdmkqn$3qbtc$1@dont-email.me> <vdn4rf$3ssv4$10@dont-email.me>
 <vdph1c$bf5v$1@dont-email.me> <vdphqj$bgk6$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2024 00:19:10 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8a51513859acb765ef87f103ba620d3c";
	logging-data="425933"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+9vcSnL6h/HyjfAWHflv7iMROsUCs3sOM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hSgKB7Pr9w/EY9UOkrlpHBuvSiY=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vdphqj$bgk6$4@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 1633

On 04/10/2024 21:05, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 19:52:12 -0000 (UTC), Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> 
>> Isn't it true that monolithic kernels become more attractive when Cs
>> problens are removed with micro kernels swapping problems for new
>> problems?
> 
> The microkernel proponents still seem to think there is a point to their
> idea, even after decades of real-world experience to the contrary.

L4 have years of sticking a middle finger up at that.