| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vdqud3$mnhe$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions? Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 10:46:27 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 27 Message-ID: <vdqud3$mnhe$1@dont-email.me> References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org> <519db81b-4a4d-417d-8cd2-7fef5a342efd@att.net> <6704347e-2f99-40f2-887f-de93f6fdd659@tha.de> <d10dbfab-9235-4fcd-a892-b407029e8f1d@att.net> <8b3e744d-3419-40c3-a7c6-fe59edd528a9@tha.de> <851e9929-8ab7-49d1-b478-e65c61fba2e3@att.net> <vd1bis$3njbp$7@dont-email.me> <d0da206d-e1c9-4a32-8ec7-64e1365a8f3e@att.net> <vd6v0d$qj9u$2@dont-email.me> <78a0f795-f1c0-4ba5-90f9-acf667968011@att.net> <vdef52$29746$3@dont-email.me> <aec625a9-581f-4692-b20f-831b9f121e52@att.net> <vdes49$2bj6r$2@dont-email.me> <adea0828-b2b1-4273-8e99-8c143f17f4f1@att.net> <vdhbhg$2qovr$1@dont-email.me> <fd9f0e31-89f5-46db-b1d9-f6f818901b2c@att.net> <vdj9rn$3713m$2@dont-email.me> <67e26dda-ec44-4927-82ac-dfc17dc3d07d@att.net> <vdmni6$3r0us$1@dont-email.me> <f2fd1874cd1db3afdce65e1fab820d103a648403@i2pn2.org> <vdodvf$5sti$5@dont-email.me> <53e48f71-1b93-4f2e-a21a-68a40b6ccefd@att.net> <vdpi26$bht3$1@dont-email.me> <0fe7418c059c5ae4c456927eed937f9df34bb7b4@i2pn2.org> Reply-To: invalid@example.invalid MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2024 10:46:27 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d89d98107657d1f38359888e77136e5e"; logging-data="745006"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19132I1oaary8cWz0DbZirJ" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:PuOtuHlEYG/1F7tZ3GxW6NAOm58= In-Reply-To: <0fe7418c059c5ae4c456927eed937f9df34bb7b4@i2pn2.org> Content-Language: de-DE Bytes: 2922 Am 05.10.2024 um 10:08 schrieb joes: > Am Fri, 04 Oct 2024 22:09:41 +0200 schrieb WM: >> On 04.10.2024 21:37, Jim Burns wrote: >>> You (WM) think that that's wrong because you (WM) think that a >>> quantifier shift is reliable. However, a quantifier shift is unreliable. >> It is more reliable than your unfounded twaddle. Ah ja. Gut, dass das dumme Arschloch "die Katze mal aus dem Sack gelassen hat". Nein, Mückenheim: a quantifier shift is NOT reliable und wird daher in der Mathematik tunlichst vermieden (und nicht nur dort). > Apparently you have no idea what a quantifier shift even is. > Have you looked at the Wikipedia page? C'mon, he's the GRÖMAZ. Don't bother him with such trivial things! >> But it is no quantifier shift but simplest logic: Translation: Nonsense. >> If ℵ₀ unit fractions [bla] Yeah, whatever.