Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vdqud3$mnhe$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Moebius <invalid@example.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit
 fractions?
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 10:46:27 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <vdqud3$mnhe$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org>
 <519db81b-4a4d-417d-8cd2-7fef5a342efd@att.net>
 <6704347e-2f99-40f2-887f-de93f6fdd659@tha.de>
 <d10dbfab-9235-4fcd-a892-b407029e8f1d@att.net>
 <8b3e744d-3419-40c3-a7c6-fe59edd528a9@tha.de>
 <851e9929-8ab7-49d1-b478-e65c61fba2e3@att.net> <vd1bis$3njbp$7@dont-email.me>
 <d0da206d-e1c9-4a32-8ec7-64e1365a8f3e@att.net> <vd6v0d$qj9u$2@dont-email.me>
 <78a0f795-f1c0-4ba5-90f9-acf667968011@att.net> <vdef52$29746$3@dont-email.me>
 <aec625a9-581f-4692-b20f-831b9f121e52@att.net> <vdes49$2bj6r$2@dont-email.me>
 <adea0828-b2b1-4273-8e99-8c143f17f4f1@att.net> <vdhbhg$2qovr$1@dont-email.me>
 <fd9f0e31-89f5-46db-b1d9-f6f818901b2c@att.net> <vdj9rn$3713m$2@dont-email.me>
 <67e26dda-ec44-4927-82ac-dfc17dc3d07d@att.net> <vdmni6$3r0us$1@dont-email.me>
 <f2fd1874cd1db3afdce65e1fab820d103a648403@i2pn2.org>
 <vdodvf$5sti$5@dont-email.me> <53e48f71-1b93-4f2e-a21a-68a40b6ccefd@att.net>
 <vdpi26$bht3$1@dont-email.me>
 <0fe7418c059c5ae4c456927eed937f9df34bb7b4@i2pn2.org>
Reply-To: invalid@example.invalid
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2024 10:46:27 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d89d98107657d1f38359888e77136e5e";
	logging-data="745006"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19132I1oaary8cWz0DbZirJ"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PuOtuHlEYG/1F7tZ3GxW6NAOm58=
In-Reply-To: <0fe7418c059c5ae4c456927eed937f9df34bb7b4@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: de-DE
Bytes: 2922

Am 05.10.2024 um 10:08 schrieb joes:
> Am Fri, 04 Oct 2024 22:09:41 +0200 schrieb WM:
>> On 04.10.2024 21:37, Jim Burns wrote:

>>> You (WM) think that that's wrong because you (WM) think that a
>>> quantifier shift is reliable. However, a quantifier shift is unreliable.

>> It is more reliable than your unfounded twaddle.

Ah ja. Gut, dass das dumme Arschloch "die Katze mal aus dem Sack 
gelassen hat".

Nein, Mückenheim: a quantifier shift is NOT reliable und wird daher in 
der Mathematik tunlichst vermieden (und nicht nur dort).

> Apparently you have no idea what a quantifier shift even is.
> Have you looked at the Wikipedia page?

C'mon, he's the GRÖMAZ. Don't bother him with such trivial things!

>> But it is no quantifier shift but simplest logic:

Translation: Nonsense.

>> If ℵ₀ unit fractions [bla]

Yeah, whatever.