| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vdrk62$pp24$4@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions? Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 16:58:10 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 31 Message-ID: <vdrk62$pp24$4@dont-email.me> References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org> <vdo8ke$586f$3@dont-email.me> <vdodmu$5sti$4@dont-email.me> <vdoeft$6biq$1@dont-email.me> <vdof0j$5suf$3@dont-email.me> <vdogjq$6l4c$1@dont-email.me> <vdpbuv$alvo$1@dont-email.me> <8c94a117d7ddaba3e7858116dc5bc7c66a46c405@i2pn2.org> <vdqttc$mnhd$1@dont-email.me> <vdr1g3$n3li$6@dont-email.me> <8ce3fac3a0c92d85c72fec966d424548baebe5af@i2pn2.org> <vdrd5q$sn2$2@news.muc.de> <55cbb075e2f793e3c52f55af73c82c61d2ce8d44@i2pn2.org> <vdrgka$sn2$3@news.muc.de> Reply-To: invalid@example.invalid MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2024 16:58:11 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a68c63666759ee15cd78797800189e4d"; logging-data="844868"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18J4uh1ubW6+B3Iy5x04H7Q" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:A6X3EEUdpJ40xHbLyK3uUIjQ1WI= In-Reply-To: <vdrgka$sn2$3@news.muc.de> Content-Language: de-DE Bytes: 2643 Am 05.10.2024 um 15:57 schrieb Alan Mackenzie: > I first came across the terms "potential infinity" and "actual infinity" > on this newsgroup, not in my degree course a few decades ago. I'm not > convinced there is any mathematically valid distinction between them. Actually, there is. But in classical mathematics "infinity" means "actual infinity", and "potential infinity" is of no significance her. "Cantor's work was well received by some of the prominent mathematicians of his day, such as Richard Dedekind. But his willingness to regard infinite sets as objects to be treated in much the same way as finite sets was bitterly attacked by others, particularly Kronecker. There was no objection to a 'potential infinity' in the form of an unending process, but an 'actual infinity' in the form of a completed infinite set was harder to accept." (Herb Enderton, Elements of Set Theory) > If there were, I would have heard of it back then. Right. > Does "actual infinity" create a logical system? -> classical mathematics = ZFC (or something like that) + classical logic.