Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Luke A. Guest" <laguest@archeia.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ironclad, the hard-Real Time capable POSIX-like kernel written in
 SPARK/Ada, received an nlnet grant
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 17:27:44 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <vdrpe0$qmuu$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vdmkqn$3qbtc$1@dont-email.me> <vdn4rf$3ssv4$10@dont-email.me>
 <vdph1c$bf5v$1@dont-email.me> <vdphqj$bgk6$4@dont-email.me>
 <vdrp8a$5pn$1@rasp.pasdenom.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2024 18:27:45 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8a51513859acb765ef87f103ba620d3c";
	logging-data="875486"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18OvKIi58qDV+P77w4oGI2xO70mY5Lpww4="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5oTD6F6ukWD/hGAmwvCXEj7TiH0=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vdrp8a$5pn$1@rasp.pasdenom.info>
Bytes: 2076

On 05/10/2024 17:24, DrPi wrote:
> Le 04/10/2024 à 22:05, Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit :
>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 19:52:12 -0000 (UTC), Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>>
>>> Isn't it true that monolithic kernels become more attractive when Cs
>>> problens are removed with micro kernels swapping problems for new
>>> problems?
>>
>> The microkernel proponents still seem to think there is a point to their
>> idea, even after decades of real-world experience to the contrary.
> Any evidence of this assertion ?
> 
> You should try QNX.
> My experience with QNX shows that it is far more stable than monolithic 
> kernels since buggy drivers can't cause the kernel to panic.
> Also, you don't have to recompile the kernel each time a driver needs to 
> be recompiled.
> I have many other arguments against monolithic kernels.

Yeah, QNX was solid. Had the source at one point.