Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vds9gu$sl6n$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_I_dare_to_relativists_to_explain_local_time=3A_t-vx?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?/c=C2=B2?=
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 23:04:40 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <vds9gu$sl6n$3@dont-email.me>
References: <8dc9a6eb5ee097da5239175cb7833cd6@www.novabbs.com>
 <ebCdnU-bKuOJYmD7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <6a64a60eb15efe9a5449ade234d05804@www.novabbs.com>
 <fc3e047c7de75fd713b8844393a5234e@www.novabbs.com>
 <vds6da$sl6n$1@dont-email.me>
 <71951787b5f1c60661ff5e5c10adbfe2@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2024 23:02:22 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e536b49a861ecd6fc0538e1a2a6ecd44";
	logging-data="939223"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18nHaPvJbJV6bzSkbddTz6z"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6rfETBOp44xWSmD9oqxHKC3RpII=
In-Reply-To: <71951787b5f1c60661ff5e5c10adbfe2@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 2171

Den 05.10.2024 22:39, skrev rhertz:
> 
> DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT YOU DIDN'T GIVE A SINGLE EXPLANATION ABOUT
> THE 49 nsec THAT APPEAR DUE TO THE vx/c² FACTOR OF THE LOCAL TIME?.
> OR WHY THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TIME IN  BOTH FRAMES (NOT RELATED
> TO THE GAMMA FACTO OF TIME DILATION) FOR THIS PARTICULAR SPEED AND
> POSITION?
> 
> 
> YOU WRITE, WRITE AND WRITE BUT CAN'T ESCAPE FROM THE FACT THAT YOU
> DON'T KNOW SHIT ABOUT LOCAL TIME. YOU (AND OTHERS) CAN'T JUST EXPLAIN
> IT.

Quite.
I and others write and write but Richard Hertz understand nothing
whatever we write.

He can only repeat over and over that SR is nonsense,
and that all physicist born after 1900 are frauds since
they claim that SR is experimentally verified and never
falsified.

Case closed.


-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/