Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_I_dare_to_relativists_to_explain_local_time=3A_t-vx?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?/c=C2=B2?=
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2024 19:54:57 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 227
Message-ID: <vduip5$1a1nf$1@dont-email.me>
References: <8dc9a6eb5ee097da5239175cb7833cd6@www.novabbs.com>
 <ebCdnU-bKuOJYmD7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <6a64a60eb15efe9a5449ade234d05804@www.novabbs.com>
 <fc3e047c7de75fd713b8844393a5234e@www.novabbs.com>
 <vds6da$sl6n$1@dont-email.me>
 <71951787b5f1c60661ff5e5c10adbfe2@www.novabbs.com>
 <vds9gu$sl6n$3@dont-email.me>
 <ceec5695e7b739e93447160276a5e2b6@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2024 19:52:37 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="42cf3be1bb739c0e53de8aefd5af4fc7";
	logging-data="1378031"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1++ST4jJ7n6zbO+RvQtRfRc"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:BLvZeEXj+WcuaN9ZQgeAmM7Lv0Y=
In-Reply-To: <ceec5695e7b739e93447160276a5e2b6@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 10047

Den 05.10.2024 23:51, skrev rhertz:
> 
> DON'T FORGET THE AWFUL TRUTH: YOU DON'T HAVE ANY IDEA ABOUT WHAT LOCAL
> TIME IS. NOT EVEN THE SLIGHTEST CLUE!
> 
> I PROVIDED MANY LINKS WITH PRETENTIOUS EXPLANATIONS, MORE METAPHYSICAL
> THAN REAL, BUT YOU DIDN'T CARE ABOUT IT.
> 
> WHAT ONLY MATTERS IS THE "FANTASTIC PAUL'S WORLD", WHERE YOU LIVE
> ENJOYING YOUR LIST OF PAPERS AND FEELING FORTUNATE OF BEING A
> "CONVERTED" RELATIVIST, MR. EE.
> 
> YOU RUINED YOUR SMALL BRAIN WITH DECADES OF EXPOSURE TO RELATIVITY. NOW,
> IT'S GOING WORSE FOR YOUR BRAIN, DUE TO THE NATURAL DECAY IN THE AMOUNT
> OF NEURONS DUE TO YOUR AGE.
> 
> EVEN YOUR PARROTING MECHANISM IS SUFFERING THE TOLL THAT AGING CAUSES.
> 
> 
> BUT REMEMBER: YOU DON'T HAVE A FUCKING CLUE ABOUT WHAT LOCAL TIME IS.
> 
> CASE CLOSED, AS YOUR MIND.

Well shouted, Richard.

Nobody can illustrate the stupidity of Richard Hertz better
than you, Richard.

Since you ask so nicely, I will remind you of other
cases when you have made a fool of yourself without my help:

| Den 02.10.2024 19:33, skrev rhertz:
|>
|> "Time is what my clock shows", infamously asserted at
|> the beginning of his plagiarized 1905 paper.
|> Assertion still sustained nowadays by relativists.
|> So, even moving at c/2, the clock of the moving observer would
|> dictate that a day last 86,400 seconds.
|> But relativity sustain the narrative that, even when your clock marks
|> 86,400 seconds/day, a remote clock (located on Earth's surface) would
|> mark 99,766 seconds/day.
|> All of this because OF A FORMULA, being impossible to verify it
|> experimentally.
|>


| Den 28.09.2024 04:34, skrev rhertz:
|>
|> This link illustrates a bit:
|> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_redshift
|>
|> Δf/f = Δλ/λ = z = GM/c² (1/R - 1/r) = Φ(R)/c² - Φ(r)/c²
|>
|> https://www.space.com/41290-biggest-star.html
|>
|> G = 6.6743E−11 m^3 kg^−1 s^−2
|> M = 5E+09 x 1.989E+30 Kg = 9.945E+39 Kg
|> R = 1,700 x 634,000 Km = 1,077,800,000,000 m
|>
|> Φ(R)/c² = 6,842,736.59
|>
|> In comparison, Φ(RSun)/c² = 0.000002327
|>


|Den 27.09.2024 22:13, skrev rhertz:
|>
|> YOU CAN'T, UNDER ANY DECENT ASSUMPTION, DARE TO ESTIMATE WHAT WAS
|> THE ELAPSED TIME AT THE USNO CLOCKS IN WASHINGTON, IF YOU ARE
|> 15,000 MILES FAR AWAY AND HAVE NOT ANY MEANS (NOT EVEN AS OF TODAY)
|> TO ESTIMATE THE TIME VALUE OF SUCH REFERENCE CLOCK.
|>


| Den 27.09.2024 00:27, skrev rhertz:
|>
|> Mudrak's 2017 formula for GNSS Galileo:
|>
|> Δf/f₀ = -GMₑ/c² (1/r - 1/a) - 1/2c² [(vˢᵃᵗ)² - (aΩₑ)²]
|>
|> If a (satellite height) is only "h" times higher than r
|> (i.e. 10 Km), then
|>
|> Δf/f₀ = gh/c² - [(vˢᵃᵗ)²+ (rΩₑ)²]/2c²   ----- Mudrak 2017
|>
|> Δτ/τ₀ = gh/c² - (2RΩv + v²)/2c² ------------ Hafele 1971
|>
|> Does it rings any bell on the void of your skull, or should
|> I explain?
|> Who made a fraudulent approximation in GR using Schwarzschild?
|>

| Den 27.09.2024 02:47, skrev rhertz:
|>
|> Your STUPID and ILLOGICAL thinking is about having bought THIS CRAP:
|> Hafele considered a good approximation the following INSANE
|> assertion:
|>
|> - WE (H&K, plus the gang at USNO) considered A GOOD IDEA to think
|>   that a good approximation is:
|>
|>  - Earth rotates at 459,24 m/sec (Equator level). We SUPPOSE that
|>    USNO labs are FLOATING IN THE AIR for the duration of our eastward
|>    trip.
|>
|>  - So, in a stroke of a genius, we SUPPOSED that being still for
|>    65.42 hours (flight time + waiting in airports) at ALTITUDE 0.0Km,
|>    we WOULD REACH USNO LABS while Earth rotates such amount
|>    (either 0° latitude or the average 34° latitude).
|>
|>  - The only thing that we have to do is TO SIT COMFORTABLY, while
|>    Earth rotates, AND in 65.42 hours we will reach USNO AGAIN
|>    (because we departed from USNO, which MAGICALLY remained STILL
|>    IN SPACE, without ANY MOTION. We are, by the hand of Einstein,
|>    who slipped eastward, to finally reach USNO again.
|>
|>  - The only uncomfortable aspect of such adventure is that OUR ASSES
|>    got wet, while moving over water at height ZERO, plus a lot of
|>    bruises in our asses while moving over earth, at h=0.
|>
|>  - But all the pain suffered worth the sacrifice, as we COULD
|>    THEORETICALLY compute the elapsed time τ₀ =65.42h =235.512E+12 ns.
|>
|>  - That such value, which we pulled out of our asses, contain errors
|>    in the order of BILLIONS OF PARTS is irrelevant, because we proved
|>    that Einstein was right.
|>


| Den 15.09.2024 03:26, skrev rhertz:
|>
|> As if the above IS NOT ENOUGH, exhaustive experiments done by France
|> since 2017 SHOWS (with error <10E-15) that THE EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE
|> BREAKS AT QUANTUM LEVEL.
|>
|> As they wrote here:
|>
|> 
https://www.oca.eu/en/news-lagrange/1363-first-results-from-microscope-satellite-confirm-albert-einstein-s-theory-of-relativity-with-unprecedented-precision
|>
|> QUOTE:
|> «The satellite’s performance is far exceeding expectations. Data
|> from more than 1,900 additional orbits are already available and
|> more are to come, which should enable us to further improve the
|> mission’s performance and approach its target of acquiring
|> measurements with a precision of 10-15. This first result is going
|> to shake the world of physics and will certainly lead to a revision
|> of alternative theories to general relativity,» said the mission’s
|> principal investigator Pierre Touboul.
|>
|> Enjoy slowly, relativists. Please don't choke on your stupidity,
|> as you are allowed to fail for being just humans.
|>

| Den 13.09.2024 19:32, skrev rhertz:
|>
|> And about your list of historical proofs of relativity,
|> I can make a deep forensic analysis of them, proving beyond
|> any reasonable doubt, that relativists are members of a MAFFIA,
|> and profit from it. This is because the different results are
|> COOKED with the help of statistical manipulations, fraud,
|> cooking and peer complicity.
|>


| Den 10.09.2024 03:19, skrev rhertz:
|>
|> Paul Andersen posted, without a bit of shame, the following:
|>>
|>> GR predicts that the gravitational deflection of em-radiation
|>> by the Sun, observed from the Earth, is:
========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========