Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<ve0kva$1nhff$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
Subject: Re: pid ranges (Was: (bash) How (really!) does the "current job" get
 determined?)
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 14:42:17 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <ve0kva$1nhff$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vdn864$2p69n$1@news.xmission.com>
 <slrnvg2nc2.2dut.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>
 <vdrs2u$2rdb7$1@news.xmission.com> <vdviph$1io9a$1@dont-email.me>
 <ve0i46$2tnuv$2@news.xmission.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 14:42:19 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1db059421062ca8ac3f29188842efbc9";
	logging-data="1820143"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+mLrO0rsW/T/XSJtTp0UXf"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.8.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Dqk5RvSCHUr/aKK4LhiNbNBXDjk=
In-Reply-To: <ve0i46$2tnuv$2@news.xmission.com>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Bytes: 2189

On 07.10.2024 13:53, Kenny McCormack wrote:
> [...]
> 
> Personally, I don't really see the point (in increasing the max pid #).  
> For practical purposes, it seems unlikely you'll ever need it (*), but then
> again, maybe there really are big systems out there that need to be running
> more than 32K processes at a time.

Yes, any [multi-user] server system will likely need larger limits
(nowadays). I forgot that my (de facto) "single-user" system is in
principle able to serve hundreds of users (or more) and must be
able to handle all their processes.

> 
> (*) And, as noted earlier, having big pid numbers makes "ps" listings weird.

IMO the 'ps' options and output is anyway a pain per se. I wonder
why I haven't yet written my own ps-fontend (based on option '-o');
probably because I don't use it often, only in case of problems.

Janis