Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit
 fractions?
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:37:32 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <ve2r0c$24i4i$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org> <vdpbuv$alvo$1@dont-email.me>
 <8c94a117d7ddaba3e7858116dc5bc7c66a46c405@i2pn2.org>
 <vdqttc$mnhd$1@dont-email.me> <vdr1g3$n3li$6@dont-email.me>
 <8ce3fac3a0c92d85c72fec966d424548baebe5af@i2pn2.org>
 <vdrd5q$sn2$2@news.muc.de>
 <55cbb075e2f793e3c52f55af73c82c61d2ce8d44@i2pn2.org>
 <vdrgka$sn2$3@news.muc.de> <vds38v$1ih6$6@solani.org>
 <vdscnj$235p$1@news.muc.de> <vdtt15$16hg6$4@dont-email.me>
 <vdu54i$271t$1@news.muc.de> <vduata$19d4m$1@dont-email.me>
 <vduf0m$1tif$1@news.muc.de> <vdufu0$1a71q$1@dont-email.me>
 <ve07ca$1kopi$3@dont-email.me> <ve0a35$1lnvn$1@dont-email.me>
 <ve0avf$3q71$1@solani.org>
 <85ffa80d987e9d59fdfc5494a1e5065f7c403ff7@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2024 10:37:32 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c541d8f9725ef3750e22acebe5e443ae";
	logging-data="2246802"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ja31Yj8wgS8dOdLtGde3L7Q5kcxke0ac="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:L3xaz/weosfDEI6RmjYpF1LkW44=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <85ffa80d987e9d59fdfc5494a1e5065f7c403ff7@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 2835

On 07.10.2024 13:20, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 10/7/24 5:51 AM, WM wrote:
>> On 07.10.2024 11:36, FromTheRafters wrote:
>>> WM formulated the question :
>>>> On 06.10.2024 19:03, FromTheRafters wrote:
>>>>> A set is a collection of well-defined objects, meaning we must be 
>>>>> able to determine if an element belongs to a particulr set.
>>>>
>>>> But you can't determine the smallest unit fraction although it is a 
>>>> singleton set, a point on the real axis.
>>>
>>> There is no smallest unit fraction.
>>
>> If there are only fixed points, then there is a point such that 
>> between it and zero there is no further point.

> Nope, not if you have an INFINITE set of fixed points.

The individual point is independent of how many others are existing.
> 
> The problem is we can't have an infinite set of fixed points, as we are 
> finite.

That is just under investigation.
> 
> So, your "actual infinity" is something beyond what we can have, so it 
> doesn't exist for us, and logic that assumes it is just breaks.

Then set theory is outdated.

Regards, WM