Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<ve4e78$2av81$14@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Apple=E2=80=99s_Custom_5G_Modem_Will_Be_An_All-In-O?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?ne_Connectivity_Solution?=
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 16:11:36 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <ve4e78$2av81$14@dont-email.me>
References: <vdtr4m$2ing$1@solani.org> <ve1u9f$1sg5i$12@dont-email.me>
 <lml770Fm0qcU1@mid.individual.net>
 <xn0ortot6ode2b000@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <lmlhopFnjcjU1@mid.individual.net> <ve45cg$616n$1@solani.org>
 <ve49ic$2aulb$1@dont-email.me> <ve4bp2$59fr$1@solani.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 01:11:37 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ba0b8db73c1c4af9dc1ca4fad2a60c91";
	logging-data="2456833"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18QRlA+n15j3lTScjs7lj6M4dhvhlCgsLc="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ibO6levhmH1/uzp+yxdL7e7cD44=
Content-Language: en-CA
In-Reply-To: <ve4bp2$59fr$1@solani.org>
Bytes: 2796

On 2024-10-08 15:29, badgolferman wrote:
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>> On 2024-10-08 13:40, badgolferman wrote:
>>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2024-10-08, badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It's Bloomberg.
>>>>>
>>>>> Where did you see this?  The only outside link I see is 9to5mac.
>>>>
>>>> Interesting, because it's right there in the article. The words "subpar
>>>> performance" link to another WCCFTech article that references Bloomberg
>>>> as the source of this claim. And if you follow that trail of articles,
>>>> you see that the claim of supposed "subpar performance" is based on
>>>> speculation rather than hard evidence (which is very typical of
>>>> Bloomberg).
>>>>
>>>
>>> Are you talking about this article? There’s really not anything in there
>>> blasting Apple. It only says it will take a long time for Apple to recoup
>>> its expenses that it already pays to Qualcomm in royalties.
>>>
>>> https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2024-08-18/why-is-apple-building-own-modem-company-plays-long-game-in-dropping-qualcomm-lzzk8616
>>>
>>
>> Right.
>>
>> So you posted a quote about supposed "subpar performance" with not basis
>> in even rumour.
>>
> 
> No. I posted a message about this:
> 
> Apple’s Custom 5G Modem Will Be An All-In-One Connectivity Solution
> 

You chose what you wanted to post.

You chose to include bullshit.

Do better.