| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<ve4e78$2av81$14@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Apple=E2=80=99s_Custom_5G_Modem_Will_Be_An_All-In-O?= =?UTF-8?Q?ne_Connectivity_Solution?= Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 16:11:36 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 42 Message-ID: <ve4e78$2av81$14@dont-email.me> References: <vdtr4m$2ing$1@solani.org> <ve1u9f$1sg5i$12@dont-email.me> <lml770Fm0qcU1@mid.individual.net> <xn0ortot6ode2b000@reader443.eternal-september.org> <lmlhopFnjcjU1@mid.individual.net> <ve45cg$616n$1@solani.org> <ve49ic$2aulb$1@dont-email.me> <ve4bp2$59fr$1@solani.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 01:11:37 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ba0b8db73c1c4af9dc1ca4fad2a60c91"; logging-data="2456833"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18QRlA+n15j3lTScjs7lj6M4dhvhlCgsLc=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:ibO6levhmH1/uzp+yxdL7e7cD44= Content-Language: en-CA In-Reply-To: <ve4bp2$59fr$1@solani.org> Bytes: 2796 On 2024-10-08 15:29, badgolferman wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >> On 2024-10-08 13:40, badgolferman wrote: >>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>> On 2024-10-08, badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Jolly Roger wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> It's Bloomberg. >>>>> >>>>> Where did you see this? The only outside link I see is 9to5mac. >>>> >>>> Interesting, because it's right there in the article. The words "subpar >>>> performance" link to another WCCFTech article that references Bloomberg >>>> as the source of this claim. And if you follow that trail of articles, >>>> you see that the claim of supposed "subpar performance" is based on >>>> speculation rather than hard evidence (which is very typical of >>>> Bloomberg). >>>> >>> >>> Are you talking about this article? There’s really not anything in there >>> blasting Apple. It only says it will take a long time for Apple to recoup >>> its expenses that it already pays to Qualcomm in royalties. >>> >>> https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2024-08-18/why-is-apple-building-own-modem-company-plays-long-game-in-dropping-qualcomm-lzzk8616 >>> >> >> Right. >> >> So you posted a quote about supposed "subpar performance" with not basis >> in even rumour. >> > > No. I posted a message about this: > > Apple’s Custom 5G Modem Will Be An All-In-One Connectivity Solution > You chose what you wanted to post. You chose to include bullshit. Do better.