Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: HHH(DDD)==0
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 11:26:27 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <ve833j$339sq$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vdgpbs$2nmcm$1@dont-email.me> <ve1r9p$1t0bn$1@dont-email.me> <ade7b09486ca9de753a35f88aa4540c0233df3dd@i2pn2.org> <ve2038$1tdjm$1@dont-email.me> <56b830364cf651238ea19749c6dda753427cf8fb@i2pn2.org> <ve21rv$1tm6t$1@dont-email.me> <4ead3c7dcd0cb13a6c655716f106bb836aa4bc47@i2pn2.org> <ve39fd$26g97$1@dont-email.me> <030f6c2bf84dc1776787d597adcf5c2015cc861d@i2pn2.org> <ve3e3r$26g97$4@dont-email.me> <8c474bc7aee03e8eedb712f48c4b39c1c9e88a7b@i2pn2.org> <ve3gb8$27ad7$1@dont-email.me> <243d02f2d3397e7f681ebdad2e9b7d8a346bb75c@i2pn2.org> <ve405a$29pn2$1@dont-email.me> <a8e26927fd1751a23d0e4fc4e68a912628bd63da@i2pn2.org> <ve473a$2afp6$1@dont-email.me> <37c291e02299479ab8b55256f3744fe0ba48f6db@i2pn2.org> <ve4e64$2bp17$1@dont-email.me> <c5fc13c930680ba5f64f34e9a1c918c8c40e3530@i2pn2.org> <ve4q83$2ckv6$2@dont-email.me> <53d3ed2cfd983f3b895f6509020bcbe98e86d3e6@i2pn2.org> <ve4ubu$2h81c$1@dont-email.me> <ve5kmb$2k3oc$1@dont-email.me> <ve5o3j$2khlq$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 10:26:28 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d591bbb3854d5810a02601aa59b70b70";
	logging-data="3254170"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18PsZtFCTEBkuTnB0dML0YN"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EHw1PyZY5apwnTpoHUf+CAzLRhM=
Bytes: 2833

On 2024-10-09 11:06:27 +0000, olcott said:

> On 10/9/2024 5:08 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-10-09 03:47:10 +0000, olcott said:
>> 
>>> On 10/8/2024 7:49 AM, Andy Walker wrote:
>>>  > Richard -- no-one sane carries on an extended discussion with
>>>  > someone they [claim to] consider a "stupid liar".  So which are you?
>>>  > Not sane?  Or stupid enough to try to score points off someone who is
>>>  > incapable of conceding them?  Or lying when you describe Peter?  You
>>>  > must surely have better things to do.  Meanwhile, you surely noticed
>>>  > that Peter is running rings around you.
>>> 
>>> I am incapable of conceding this self-evident truth:
>>> 
>>>    DDD emulated by each corresponding HHH that can possibly
>>>    exist never returns
>> 
>> That is not self-evident or even meaningful without a definition of
>> "each corresponding HHH".


> An HHH/DDD pair such that DDD calls its own emulator.

That does not mean anything as you have not yet said what "an
HHH/DDD pair" means.

-- 
Mikko