Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.szaf.org!news.amigaxess.de!news.amigaxess.de!.POSTED.185.209.199.140!not-for-mail
From: Schlomo Goldberg <schlomo.goldberg@mailinator.com>
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: a name for the google groups exit -- GGexit?
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 20:27:12 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: AmigaXess
Message-ID: <ve9db0$9mhk$1@amigaxess.de>
References: <87y1ajh81d.fsf@tudado.org> <ut22db$2ctri$4@dont-email.me>
	<20240420141857.0c3ab6a1@234567aaa> <v08k64$1mnp0$5@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 20:27:12 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: amigaxess.de; posting-host="185.209.199.140";
	logging-data="318004"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@amigaxess.de"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Bytes: 1677
Lines: 25

candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
writes:

> useful eater <use@full.invalid> wrote at 20:20 this Saturday (GMT):
>> On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:01:15 -0700
>> HenHanna <HenHanna@devnull.tb> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/15/2024 7:41 AM, Johanne Fairchild wrote:
>>> > You know, people called it the BREXIT.  We should have a name for
>>> > the Google exit from USENET.  GEXIT?  How about GGREXIT? :-) It's
>>> > now part of USENET history and we're the true writers.
>>> > 
>>> > I like the sound of GGREXIT, but not the spelling.  Maybe GEXIT is
>>> > better overall.  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> GGexit?
>>
>>
>> Skynet bails.
>
>
> Ah cmon. At least skynet was obvious with how evil it was.

AFAIK they never specified why Skynet wanted to kill all humans. It's
possible that it had valid reasons, you know.