Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<ve9mrh$3aiao$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bart <bc@freeuk.com> Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 00:09:39 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 20 Message-ID: <ve9mrh$3aiao$2@dont-email.me> References: <uu54la$3su5b$6@dont-email.me> <87edbtz43p.fsf@tudado.org> <0d2cnVzOmbD6f4z7nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <uusur7$2hm6p$1@dont-email.me> <vdf096$2c9hb$8@dont-email.me> <87a5fdj7f2.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com> <ve83q2$33dfe$1@dont-email.me> <87wmighu4i.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com> <ve8s6d$3725r$1@dont-email.me> <87o73rj3sr.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com> <20241010120827.867@kylheku.com> <87frp3itsk.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 01:09:37 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e855f7326897fc9dc7def665be4b215a"; logging-data="3492184"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+MJ+S/6bR96e3tMvc/0Gpu" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:lGjq9h1UiR+w0caS816/GFRy7aI= In-Reply-To: <87frp3itsk.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com> Content-Language: en-GB Bytes: 2114 On 10/10/2024 21:31, Rainer Weikusat wrote: > Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> writes: > Thinks start to become complicated once references to complex objects > are involved. Eg, > > @{$$a[0]} > > is the array referred to by the first item of the array $a refers to and > > ${$$a[0]}[0] > > which seriously starts to look like a trench fortification with > barbed-wire obstacles is a way to refer to the first element of this > array. I thought you were defending the language. Now you seem to be agreeing with how bad this syntax is.