Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vea0mi$3cg0k$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: They actual truth is that ... Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 20:57:38 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 70 Message-ID: <vea0mi$3cg0k$2@dont-email.me> References: <ve39pb$24k00$1@dont-email.me> <39f1a350cac0a8431753486526da1c35f458df65@i2pn2.org> <ve6lsa$207d$2@news.muc.de> <ve8289$336c8$1@dont-email.me> <ve91hf$1ab4$1@news.muc.de> <7959253e834d2861b27ab7b3881619c2017e199f.camel@gmail.com> <ve9ju2$3ar6j$1@dont-email.me> <a965e0f825570212334deda4a92cd7489c33c687@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 03:57:39 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="45d09d337d8f7f50056d122f5780fe20"; logging-data="3555348"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+00o0FvJuHZGETo+iUzZOw" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:FOeD9lcOywK81wCVPfvABZlXMhk= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <a965e0f825570212334deda4a92cd7489c33c687@i2pn2.org> Bytes: 3944 On 10/10/2024 8:39 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 10/10/24 6:19 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 10/10/2024 2:26 PM, wij wrote: >>> On Thu, 2024-10-10 at 17:05 +0000, Alan Mackenzie wrote: >>>> Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> wrote: >>>>> On 2024-10-09 19:34:34 +0000, Alan Mackenzie said: >>>> >>>>>> Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> wrote: >>>>>>> On 10/8/24 8:49 AM, Andy Walker wrote: >>>>>>>> ... after a short break. >>>> >>>>>>>> Richard -- no-one sane carries on an extended discussion with >>>>>>>> someone they [claim to] consider a "stupid liar". So which are >>>>>>>> you? >>>>>>>> Not sane? Or stupid enough to try to score points off someone >>>>>>>> who is >>>>>>>> incapable of conceding them? Or lying when you describe Peter? >>>>>>>> You >>>>>>>> must surely have better things to do. Meanwhile, you surely >>>>>>>> noticed >>>>>>>> that Peter is running rings around you. >>>> >>>>>>> In other words, you don't understand the concept of defense of >>>>>>> the truth. >>>> >>>>>> Maybe, but continuously calling your debating opponent a liar, and >>>>>> doing >>>>>> so in oversized upper case, goes beyond truth and comes perilously >>>>>> close >>>>>> to stalking. >>>> >>>>> Calling a liar a liar is fully justified. I don't know how often it >>>>> needs be done but readers of a liar may want to know that they are >>>>> reading a liar. >>>> >>>> We know Peter Olcott has lied in things that matter. However, I >>>> believe >>>> his continual falsehoods are more a matter of delusion than mendacity. >>>> As Mike Terry has said, OP's intellectual capacity is low. Calling him >>>> a liar in virtually every post is, I think, unwarranted. >>>> >>>>>> It detracts from the substance of your posts, and makes >>>>>> them, for me at least, thoroughly unpleasant to read. >>>> >>>>> You probably needn't read them. >>>> >>>> As I said, I mostly don't - which is a pity, since Richard Damon often >>>> posts stuff worth reading. >>>> >>>>> As soon you find out that they repeat the same over and over, neither >>>>> correcting their substantial errors nor improving their arguments you >>>>> have read enough. >>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Mikko >>> >>> olcott deliberately lies (he knows what is told, he choose to >>> distort). olcott >> >> When the behavior of DDD emulated by HHH is the measure then: > > But since it isn't, your whole argument falls apart. > Ah a breakthrough. -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer