Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: They actual truth is that ...
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 07:19:51 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 91
Message-ID: <veb557$3lbkf$2@dont-email.me>
References: <ve39pb$24k00$1@dont-email.me>
 <39f1a350cac0a8431753486526da1c35f458df65@i2pn2.org>
 <ve6lsa$207d$2@news.muc.de> <ve8289$336c8$1@dont-email.me>
 <ve91hf$1ab4$1@news.muc.de>
 <7959253e834d2861b27ab7b3881619c2017e199f.camel@gmail.com>
 <ve9ju2$3ar6j$1@dont-email.me>
 <a965e0f825570212334deda4a92cd7489c33c687@i2pn2.org>
 <vea0mi$3cg0k$2@dont-email.me>
 <a4d0f7ff8798ce118247147d7d0385028ae44168@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 14:19:52 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="45d09d337d8f7f50056d122f5780fe20";
	logging-data="3845775"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/DVWEb1T4OgZz0Sd4VG5S1"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/fAKtkzOJs0PTjbCzFtrOzBait8=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <a4d0f7ff8798ce118247147d7d0385028ae44168@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 4645

On 10/11/2024 6:04 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 10/10/24 9:57 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 10/10/2024 8:39 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 10/10/24 6:19 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 10/10/2024 2:26 PM, wij wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 2024-10-10 at 17:05 +0000, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>>>>>> Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2024-10-09 19:34:34 +0000, Alan Mackenzie said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 10/8/24 8:49 AM, Andy Walker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> ... after a short break.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>      Richard -- no-one sane carries on an extended discussion 
>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>> someone they [claim to] consider a "stupid liar".  So which 
>>>>>>>>>> are you?
>>>>>>>>>> Not sane?  Or stupid enough to try to score points off someone 
>>>>>>>>>> who is
>>>>>>>>>> incapable of conceding them?  Or lying when you describe 
>>>>>>>>>> Peter? You
>>>>>>>>>> must surely have better things to do.  Meanwhile, you surely 
>>>>>>>>>> noticed
>>>>>>>>>> that Peter is running rings around you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In other words, you don't understand the concept of defense of 
>>>>>>>>> the truth.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe, but continuously calling your debating opponent a liar, 
>>>>>>>> and doing
>>>>>>>> so in oversized upper case, goes beyond truth and comes 
>>>>>>>> perilously close
>>>>>>>> to stalking.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Calling a liar a liar is fully justified. I don't know how often it
>>>>>>> needs be done but readers of a liar may want to know that they are
>>>>>>> reading a liar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We know Peter Olcott has lied in things that matter.  However, I 
>>>>>> believe
>>>>>> his continual falsehoods are more a matter of delusion than 
>>>>>> mendacity.
>>>>>> As Mike Terry has said, OP's intellectual capacity is low.  
>>>>>> Calling him
>>>>>> a liar in virtually every post is, I think, unwarranted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It detracts from the substance of your posts, and makes
>>>>>>>> them, for me at least, thoroughly unpleasant to read.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You probably needn't read them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As I said, I mostly don't - which is a pity, since Richard Damon 
>>>>>> often
>>>>>> posts stuff worth reading.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As soon you find out that they repeat the same over and over, 
>>>>>>> neither
>>>>>>> correcting their substantial errors nor improving their arguments 
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>> have read enough.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> Mikko
>>>>>
>>>>> olcott deliberately lies (he knows what is told, he choose to 
>>>>> distort). olcott
>>>>
>>>> When the behavior of DDD emulated by HHH is the measure then:
>>>
>>> But since it isn't, your whole argument falls apart.
>>>
>>
>> Ah a breakthrough.
>>
>>
> 
> And an admission that you are just working on a lie.
> 

Perhaps you are unaware of how valid deductive inference works.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deductive_reasoning
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

You can disagree that the premise to my reasoning is true.
By changing my premise as the basis of your rebuttal you
commit the strawman error.


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer