Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?= <hugybear@gmx.net>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: green bubble syndrome
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 23:11:10 +0200
Organization: Camembert Normand aus Lait Cru
Message-ID: <vec49e$a364$1@solani.org>
References: <xn0oruv2k1siabt002@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <ve6sv0$2q45v$1@dont-email.me> <ve7s0q$31vac$1@dont-email.me>
 <ve7uos$7t6o$2@solani.org> <vebtjl$3pa58$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 21:11:10 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="330948"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:128.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/128.3.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ckUNGqmmgh5tt5ufCYuBXgFWIsw=
X-User-ID: eJwNxsEBwCAIA8CZIiSk4yiW/Udo73UMQV0pKjmccsduHRFOx7qu5T2Ypw7GL3Rpx3/YlfkBD/MQYg==
Content-Language: de-CH, en-GB
In-Reply-To: <vebtjl$3pa58$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3237
Lines: 44

On 11.10.24 21:17, Chris wrote:
> Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> wrote:
>> On 10.10.24 08:25, Chris wrote:
>>> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2024-10-09 14:30:27 +0000, badgolferman said:
>>>>>
>>>>> If you're an Android user, and you've been sensing some deep tensions
>>>>> between yourself and iPhone users, you may not be imagining it.
>>>>> According to a new survey conducted by All About Cookies, some iPhone
>>>>> users "think less" of others represented as a green bubble while
>>>>> texting, which often depicts Android users.
>>>>>
>>>>> Conversely, a notable number of Android users have considered switching
>>>>> to iPhone. Not necessarily because they believe that it's a better
>>>>> device, but because they've felt pressured or ridiculed into making the
>>>>> change.
>>>>>
>>>>> For this study, All About Cookies surveyed 1,000 anonymous adults in
>>>>> July 2024 via Pollfish, a market research survey tool.
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>> Wow! A whole 1000 ... what's that, 0.000000000000001% of users? What a 
>>>> cmoplete waste of time and money. There's absolutely nothing actually 
>>>> meaningful nor useful in that survey "result".  :-\
>>>
>>> You've no idea how surveying works. If done correctly 1-2 thousand ppl is a
>>> good sized survey. 
>>
>> No it isn't. Statistically it is totally irrelevant.
>> The interpretation of these low quality results is simply impossible
>> because the structure of the chosen sample is unknown (Age, gender,
>> income, regional aspects etc etc.).
> 
> Hence why I said "if done correctly". You don't have evidence that the
> sampling was done incorrectly. So you calling them "low quality" is simply
> a reflection of your own bias. 

Nonsense. Like always. I stick to what Sir Winston Churchill said about
statistics. And btw: As a matter of fact it is not me who hast to prove
the statistic or the methodology is wrong, they have to prove they did
the survey correctly and the result is meaningful.


-- 
"Roma locuta, causa finita." (Augustinus)