Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vecb9g$3r6ms$11@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Does Dimdows Know What Time It Is?
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 23:10:40 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <vecb9g$3r6ms$11@dont-email.me>
References: <hwmKO.36384$afc4.11514@fx42.iad> <vddgqf$24oap$1@dont-email.me>
	<bfyKO.37639$afc4.24519@fx42.iad> <vdg0pn$2k2ps$1@dont-email.me>
	<bmSKO.243830$v8v2.80772@fx18.iad>
	<pan$c95bb$cbe518b0$39a1d215$2736670b@linux.rocks>
	<vdhmn3$2sase$2@dont-email.me> <t41LO.34727$rIH3.25125@fx40.iad>
	<vdje0h$37qau$3@dont-email.me> <gfbLO.276631$FzW1.145242@fx14.iad>
	<vdjgsm$37qau$9@dont-email.me> <xLbLO.69482$2nv5.49161@fx39.iad>
	<vdm399$3nim2$1@dont-email.me> <5txLO.77672$S9Vb.14643@fx45.iad>
	<j96ufjtp5rtnbhutj0aaetgph9t4k07ei3@4ax.com>
	<lm9ae2Frnk8U2@mid.individual.net> <vdo3u4$4q92$6@dont-email.me>
	<67005ae4$0$3653$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 01:10:41 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c5355a95aaf967e5c35c649cc5a0b328";
	logging-data="4037340"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18fKZfRLhdrDfWONlSNNuuo"
User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:cy1o9ozfRcjud8KjMRrYBoqQzlw=
Bytes: 2172

On 04 Oct 2024 21:15:16 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:

> Le 04-10-2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> a écrit :
>>
>> I’m not sure about the legalities of dual-licensing. If you look at
>> licences like the GPL, they have wording that says “if you don’t accept
>> this licence, then you don’t have permission to use the software”. That
>> kind of precludes getting that permission via an alternative licence
>> ...
> 
> There is no reason to put a line of code under two licences, I don't
> believe that exists.

It does. Perl being one example.