Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<veccpj$3rfre$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: core memory, Historical evolution of CPU perf
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 16:36:18 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <veccpj$3rfre$1@dont-email.me>
References: <jwvh69l6zms.fsf-monnier+comp.arch@gnu.org>
 <1fd00af7b706a22d8e588cef3be10a6b@www.novabbs.org>
 <ve9rdc$3bqg4$1@dont-email.me> <veam42$3i733$1@dont-email.me>
 <vebuur$2cvr$1@gal.iecc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 01:36:19 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="202e4e8689c041d39c2353ca7871dc42";
	logging-data="4046702"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/I7mCja5346ixv0iHnWZREnQCwSNBVC3k="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nAt6l5yLlWO/LQpmiZeZKZlbGLg=
In-Reply-To: <vebuur$2cvr$1@gal.iecc.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2349

On 10/11/2024 12:40 PM, John Levine wrote:
> According to BGB  <cr88192@gmail.com>:
>>>> We used the 11/20 as a remote debug device for the 8085 cash
>>>> register machine(s) we were building.
>>>
>>> Core memory: slow to access but also slow to forget.
>>
>> Core memory was before my time, but I remember reading somewhere that it
>> needed to be preheated to a certain operating temperature in order to
>> write to it (because the hysteresis energy of the ferrite rings was
>> temperature dependent, and it needed too much power to flip the bits at
>> lower temperatures).
> 
> The memory for the IBM 7090 in the late 1950s was in a heated oil bath
> but they soon figured out how to make core work at room temperature.
> On the PDP-8 and PDP-11's that I used, the core was in the box with
> everything else with no special temperature controls.
> 

And in the late 1960s and early 1970s the Univac 1108s and the IBM S/360 
models 30 and 65 that I worked with worked just fine in the typical 
cooled computer rooms of the day (IIRC high 60s degrees F)


-- 
  - Stephen Fuld
(e-mail address disguised to prevent spam)