Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Richard given an official cease-and-desist order regarding
 counter-factual libelous statements
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:57:32 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <vedh6d$4891$1@dont-email.me>
References: <ve39pb$24k00$1@dont-email.me> <ve56ko$2i956$1@dont-email.me>
 <ve5nr2$2khlq$1@dont-email.me>
 <212f549294ebc77a918569aea93bea2a4a20286a@i2pn2.org>
 <ve6j1u$2og2c$1@dont-email.me>
 <f9d1bf5073fbffaa8d19bc76ca53020d263e7e16@i2pn2.org>
 <vea0iq$3cg0k$1@dont-email.me> <veas8b$3k751$1@dont-email.me>
 <veb6d6$3lbkf$4@dont-email.me>
 <abdfd1ca7abecda8618d1f029c3ea9823fa3b077@i2pn2.org>
 <vebgka$3n9aq$1@dont-email.me>
 <9ba1b363605f6eafab3c7084de8052b5732c2ecb@i2pn2.org>
 <vebncp$3nqde$2@dont-email.me>
 <35d61c22e9b7c379f8b8c24a7ea03edb6cb5dff8@i2pn2.org>
 <vec45r$3pqr6$2@dont-email.me>
 <ae05d9ecf74719e986062279b104234dba57116d@i2pn2.org>
 <vec685$3qavn$2@dont-email.me>
 <f76b8956cc65a3ee09b414a54779e14c061c7cab@i2pn2.org>
 <vec7m4$3qme3$1@dont-email.me>
 <866b3eb92d549c57a3ccfdb705b323dbae3cb8e8@i2pn2.org>
 <vec955$3qme3$2@dont-email.me> <vedc19$3k25$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 11:57:33 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2f696c00f58e5fa7aed5825233c6f706";
	logging-data="139553"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+UVqTove/XN99gMH/4MAfV"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:NAdCAxP9QiFQml29ZOAch29auow=
In-Reply-To: <vedc19$3k25$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US

On 10/12/2024 3:29 AM, Mikko wrote:
> On 2024-10-11 22:34:13 +0000, olcott said:
> 
>> On 10/11/2024 5:20 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> O
> 
>>> No, it shows that HHH can not correctly emulate DDD and return an 
>>> answer.
>>
>> That you can't even pay attention to the fact that we are
>> only talking about the behavior of DDD emulated by HHH and
>> not talking about whether or not HHH returns a value would
>> seem to be a good incompetence defense to defamation.
> 
> You are not paying attention to the fact that DDD returns if and only
> if HHH(DDD) returns, so the qestions whether HHH returns and wehther
> DDD returns are essentially the same.
> 

My key advantage is that I pay much more attention than anyone
else here does.

void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}

When HHH is an x86 emulation based termination analyzer
then each DDD emulated by any HHH that it calls never returns.

Each of the directly executed HHH emulator/analyzers that returns
0 correctly reports the above non-terminating behavior of its input.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer