Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vedtp9$67jl$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions? (infinitary) Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:32:25 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 15 Message-ID: <vedtp9$67jl$1@dont-email.me> References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org> <vdu4mt$18h8h$1@dont-email.me> <vdu874$271t$2@news.muc.de> <vdua6f$18vqi$2@dont-email.me> <vdubg3$24me$1@news.muc.de> <4bc3b086-247a-4547-89cc-1d47f502659d@tha.de> <ve0n4i$1vps$1@news.muc.de> <ve10qb$1p7ge$1@dont-email.me> <ve117p$vob$1@news.muc.de> <ve315q$24f8f$3@dont-email.me> <ve46vu$324$2@news.muc.de> <ve5u2i$2jobg$4@dont-email.me> <ve6329$19d5$1@news.muc.de> <ve64kl$2m0nm$4@dont-email.me> <ve66f3$19d5$2@news.muc.de> <ve683o$6c2o$1@solani.org> <ve6a23$19d5$3@news.muc.de> <ve6c3b$6esq$2@solani.org> <48b939c8a1dfbe9ea0f38dd276df4f31bbe17a1f@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:32:25 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5c61b1286c9e8512cadc16931fc6eb69"; logging-data="204405"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18YmDSfZvFgq4i3xgZuCOPOOEaAprohtZI=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:aGBMr6o4xihueAKvcMl5NJ31NTg= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <48b939c8a1dfbe9ea0f38dd276df4f31bbe17a1f@i2pn2.org> Bytes: 2196 On 10.10.2024 21:48, joes wrote: > Am Wed, 09 Oct 2024 18:47:39 +0200 schrieb WM: >> Numbers multiplied by 2 do not remain unchanged. That is not intuition >> but mathematics. > They do, however, remain natural. They do not remain the same set as before. They cover more of the real line. If they all are natnumbers, then there are more than at the outset. That means potential infinity. If there are not more natumbers than at the outset, then infinite numbers have been created. There is no way to avoid one of these results. Regards, WM