Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vef86o$cmfp$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: EMC compliance question
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 12:36:22 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <vef86o$cmfp$2@dont-email.me>
References: <67070ba9$1$1783$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
 <ve9e5c$39rmc$1@dont-email.me> <dsfggj1a5m9mise9781qmh1roqv3pb68jr@4ax.com>
 <gtcjgjlhuspq5aktltgrebvgdcqgkgvk36@4ax.com> <vedg2l$440i$2@dont-email.me>
 <0k4lgjl2vb6jd1f2ssguddcfaa2buq9coi@4ax.com>
 <670aa2f7$1$2385536$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
 <omalgj9pcsfnahltsjp0b7ovu0onp9u6v3@4ax.com> <veetam$3dqq$1@dont-email.me>
 <ki1mgjpeo0tjgmf8sn9bcngda8srcgg56d@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 03:36:24 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fc20591169459ab9346dc13a9cc044f6";
	logging-data="416249"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+8gTorZO5tdXwQvuBxQsy4g0GqNVDZBTI="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Gt4bzOZ9+TI1RdYEJ6Vg/0imyMY=
In-Reply-To: <ki1mgjpeo0tjgmf8sn9bcngda8srcgg56d@4ax.com>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 241012-4, 13/10/2024), Outbound message
Bytes: 4492

On 13/10/2024 10:30 am, john larkin wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 23:30:46 +0100, John R Walliker
> <jrwalliker@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 12/10/2024 18:07, john larkin wrote:
>>> On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 12:25:27 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/12/2024 11:22 AM, john larkin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> 48 is super common now. All our phones are PoE powered, which is
>>>>> typically about 54 volts. Digikey sells warts up to 65.
>>>>>
>>>>> The phones are cool. I can take one to Hawaii and plug it in and it
>>>>> works just like it does here.
>>>>>
>>>>> I imagine that europe has tens, maybe hundreds of millions of PoE
>>>>> devices with the chinese version of the CE mark molded into the case.
>>>>>
>>>>> So if european manufacturers realy have to do all the CE certs and
>>>>> testing, they have one more reason that they can't compete with
>>>>> imports.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So as of 2019 it looks like the US rules are similar to the European
>>>> "can't enforce" rules in that the manufacturer takes responsibility for
>>>> everything and it's up to the mfgr how and what tests they perform to
>>>> determine compliance:
>>>>
>>>> <https://www.electronicdesign.com/technologies/test-measurement/article/21209868/recent-developments-in-emc-legislation>
>>>>
>>>> This makes it sound like it's not too expensive to do some basic
>>>> compliance tests on a small-volume product in house:
>>>>
>>>> <https://incompliancemag.com/emc-bench-notes-how-to-use-spectrum-analyzers-for-emc/>
>>>>
>>>> Need a 1 GHz-ish spectrum analyzer at least as the main tool which
>>>> aren't exorbitantly expensive nowadays.
>>>
>>> I can buy a spectrum analyzer and a surfboard antenna for under $1000,
>>> and can take a product out in the country and do an open-field test
>>> and crudely ballpark its EMI signature.
>>>
>>> CE requires screen room testing and more quantitative measurement.
>>>
>>> The reality today is that few products are honestly certified for EMI
>>> or safety, and life goes on pretty well. If a product causes massive
>>> EMI problems or hurts people, civil and criminal liabilities apply.
>>
>> My experience differs.  Every product that I have been involved
>> with has been independently tested by Intertek or a test lab of
>> similar status.
>>   > It's impressive how few EMI problems there are in real life.
>>>
>> Maybe that is because many products are actually tested and compliant.
>> I can remember when audio equipment was very susceptible to
>> interference from many sources.  Those days are mostly gone.
>> I have come across exceptions of course.
>>
>> John
> 
> Most audio equipment is digital now.

Most of most audio equipment is digital nowadays. The inputs aren't, and 
neither are the outputs. Domestic audio equipment usually gets it's 
input as a digital data stream - FM radio is an exception - but creating 
that input depends on analog microphones.

-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydney