Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vef86o$cmfp$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: EMC compliance question Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 12:36:22 +1100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 70 Message-ID: <vef86o$cmfp$2@dont-email.me> References: <67070ba9$1$1783$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <ve9e5c$39rmc$1@dont-email.me> <dsfggj1a5m9mise9781qmh1roqv3pb68jr@4ax.com> <gtcjgjlhuspq5aktltgrebvgdcqgkgvk36@4ax.com> <vedg2l$440i$2@dont-email.me> <0k4lgjl2vb6jd1f2ssguddcfaa2buq9coi@4ax.com> <670aa2f7$1$2385536$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <omalgj9pcsfnahltsjp0b7ovu0onp9u6v3@4ax.com> <veetam$3dqq$1@dont-email.me> <ki1mgjpeo0tjgmf8sn9bcngda8srcgg56d@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 03:36:24 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fc20591169459ab9346dc13a9cc044f6"; logging-data="416249"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+8gTorZO5tdXwQvuBxQsy4g0GqNVDZBTI=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:Gt4bzOZ9+TI1RdYEJ6Vg/0imyMY= In-Reply-To: <ki1mgjpeo0tjgmf8sn9bcngda8srcgg56d@4ax.com> X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Content-Language: en-US X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 241012-4, 13/10/2024), Outbound message Bytes: 4492 On 13/10/2024 10:30 am, john larkin wrote: > On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 23:30:46 +0100, John R Walliker > <jrwalliker@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 12/10/2024 18:07, john larkin wrote: >>> On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 12:25:27 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote: >>> >>>> On 10/12/2024 11:22 AM, john larkin wrote: >>>> >>>>> 48 is super common now. All our phones are PoE powered, which is >>>>> typically about 54 volts. Digikey sells warts up to 65. >>>>> >>>>> The phones are cool. I can take one to Hawaii and plug it in and it >>>>> works just like it does here. >>>>> >>>>> I imagine that europe has tens, maybe hundreds of millions of PoE >>>>> devices with the chinese version of the CE mark molded into the case. >>>>> >>>>> So if european manufacturers realy have to do all the CE certs and >>>>> testing, they have one more reason that they can't compete with >>>>> imports. >>>>> >>>> >>>> So as of 2019 it looks like the US rules are similar to the European >>>> "can't enforce" rules in that the manufacturer takes responsibility for >>>> everything and it's up to the mfgr how and what tests they perform to >>>> determine compliance: >>>> >>>> <https://www.electronicdesign.com/technologies/test-measurement/article/21209868/recent-developments-in-emc-legislation> >>>> >>>> This makes it sound like it's not too expensive to do some basic >>>> compliance tests on a small-volume product in house: >>>> >>>> <https://incompliancemag.com/emc-bench-notes-how-to-use-spectrum-analyzers-for-emc/> >>>> >>>> Need a 1 GHz-ish spectrum analyzer at least as the main tool which >>>> aren't exorbitantly expensive nowadays. >>> >>> I can buy a spectrum analyzer and a surfboard antenna for under $1000, >>> and can take a product out in the country and do an open-field test >>> and crudely ballpark its EMI signature. >>> >>> CE requires screen room testing and more quantitative measurement. >>> >>> The reality today is that few products are honestly certified for EMI >>> or safety, and life goes on pretty well. If a product causes massive >>> EMI problems or hurts people, civil and criminal liabilities apply. >> >> My experience differs. Every product that I have been involved >> with has been independently tested by Intertek or a test lab of >> similar status. >> > It's impressive how few EMI problems there are in real life. >>> >> Maybe that is because many products are actually tested and compliant. >> I can remember when audio equipment was very susceptible to >> interference from many sources. Those days are mostly gone. >> I have come across exceptions of course. >> >> John > > Most audio equipment is digital now. Most of most audio equipment is digital nowadays. The inputs aren't, and neither are the outputs. Domestic audio equipment usually gets it's input as a digital data stream - FM radio is an exception - but creating that input depends on analog microphones. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney