Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vefugv$js3d$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Richard given an official cease-and-desist order regarding counter-factual libelous statements Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 10:57:19 +0300 Organization: - Lines: 30 Message-ID: <vefugv$js3d$1@dont-email.me> References: <ve39pb$24k00$1@dont-email.me> <ve56ko$2i956$1@dont-email.me> <ve5nr2$2khlq$1@dont-email.me> <212f549294ebc77a918569aea93bea2a4a20286a@i2pn2.org> <ve6j1u$2og2c$1@dont-email.me> <f9d1bf5073fbffaa8d19bc76ca53020d263e7e16@i2pn2.org> <vea0iq$3cg0k$1@dont-email.me> <veas8b$3k751$1@dont-email.me> <veb6d6$3lbkf$4@dont-email.me> <abdfd1ca7abecda8618d1f029c3ea9823fa3b077@i2pn2.org> <vebgka$3n9aq$1@dont-email.me> <9ba1b363605f6eafab3c7084de8052b5732c2ecb@i2pn2.org> <vebncp$3nqde$2@dont-email.me> <35d61c22e9b7c379f8b8c24a7ea03edb6cb5dff8@i2pn2.org> <vec45r$3pqr6$2@dont-email.me> <ae05d9ecf74719e986062279b104234dba57116d@i2pn2.org> <vec685$3qavn$2@dont-email.me> <f76b8956cc65a3ee09b414a54779e14c061c7cab@i2pn2.org> <vec7m4$3qme3$1@dont-email.me> <866b3eb92d549c57a3ccfdb705b323dbae3cb8e8@i2pn2.org> <vec955$3qme3$2@dont-email.me> <vedc19$3k25$1@dont-email.me> <vedh6d$4891$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 09:57:20 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b99f9ae25acd9c34e0b790893686dcea"; logging-data="651373"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+RGC+6frzkerUOyjGtTIGc" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:kWXoWkHdW5Jzg7N2uNawsqU0x/g= Bytes: 2799 On 2024-10-12 09:57:32 +0000, olcott said: > On 10/12/2024 3:29 AM, Mikko wrote: >> On 2024-10-11 22:34:13 +0000, olcott said: >> >>> On 10/11/2024 5:20 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>> O >> >>>> No, it shows that HHH can not correctly emulate DDD and return an answer. >>> >>> That you can't even pay attention to the fact that we are >>> only talking about the behavior of DDD emulated by HHH and >>> not talking about whether or not HHH returns a value would >>> seem to be a good incompetence defense to defamation. >> >> You are not paying attention to the fact that DDD returns if and only >> if HHH(DDD) returns, so the qestions whether HHH returns and wehther >> DDD returns are essentially the same. > > My key advantage is that I pay much more attention than anyone > else here does. Perahps to something but not to the fact that DDD returns if and only if HHH(DDD) returns, so the questions whether HHH returns and whether DDD returns are essentially the same. -- Mikko