Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Richard given an official cease-and-desist order regarding
 counter-factual libelous statements
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 07:37:50 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <vegeuu$lk27$7@dont-email.me>
References: <ve39pb$24k00$1@dont-email.me> <ve56ko$2i956$1@dont-email.me>
 <ve5nr2$2khlq$1@dont-email.me>
 <212f549294ebc77a918569aea93bea2a4a20286a@i2pn2.org>
 <ve6j1u$2og2c$1@dont-email.me>
 <f9d1bf5073fbffaa8d19bc76ca53020d263e7e16@i2pn2.org>
 <vea0iq$3cg0k$1@dont-email.me> <veas8b$3k751$1@dont-email.me>
 <veb6d6$3lbkf$4@dont-email.me>
 <abdfd1ca7abecda8618d1f029c3ea9823fa3b077@i2pn2.org>
 <vebgka$3n9aq$1@dont-email.me>
 <9ba1b363605f6eafab3c7084de8052b5732c2ecb@i2pn2.org>
 <vebncp$3nqde$2@dont-email.me>
 <35d61c22e9b7c379f8b8c24a7ea03edb6cb5dff8@i2pn2.org>
 <vec45r$3pqr6$2@dont-email.me>
 <ae05d9ecf74719e986062279b104234dba57116d@i2pn2.org>
 <vec685$3qavn$2@dont-email.me>
 <f76b8956cc65a3ee09b414a54779e14c061c7cab@i2pn2.org>
 <vec7m4$3qme3$1@dont-email.me>
 <866b3eb92d549c57a3ccfdb705b323dbae3cb8e8@i2pn2.org>
 <vec955$3qme3$2@dont-email.me> <vedc19$3k25$1@dont-email.me>
 <vedh6d$4891$1@dont-email.me> <vefugv$js3d$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 14:37:50 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4dff4ea9256eef2f131620d81ba94869";
	logging-data="708679"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+lHezu+G3vqZn6jHl1M2K+"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qNejkQ/F4iI0zn7BdZlkLAE4nhw=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vefugv$js3d$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3786

On 10/13/2024 2:57 AM, Mikko wrote:
> On 2024-10-12 09:57:32 +0000, olcott said:
> 
>> On 10/12/2024 3:29 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>> On 2024-10-11 22:34:13 +0000, olcott said:
>>>
>>>> On 10/11/2024 5:20 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> O
>>>
>>>>> No, it shows that HHH can not correctly emulate DDD and return an 
>>>>> answer.
>>>>
>>>> That you can't even pay attention to the fact that we are
>>>> only talking about the behavior of DDD emulated by HHH and
>>>> not talking about whether or not HHH returns a value would
>>>> seem to be a good incompetence defense to defamation.
>>>
>>> You are not paying attention to the fact that DDD returns if and only
>>> if HHH(DDD) returns, so the qestions whether HHH returns and wehther
>>> DDD returns are essentially the same.
>>
>> My key advantage is that I pay much more attention than anyone
>> else here does.
> 
> Perahps to something but not to the fact that DDD returns if and only if 
> HHH(DDD) returns, so the questions whether HHH returns and whether DDD
> returns are essentially the same.
> 

I am not and never have been claiming anything about incorrect
paraphrases of these exact words:

*HHH rejects DDD as non terminating*

void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}

When HHH is an x86 emulation based termination analyzer
then each DDD emulated by any HHH that it calls never returns.

Each of the directly executed HHH emulator/analyzers that returns
0 correctly reports the above non-terminating behavior of its input.

*Fully operational code is here*
https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c 
https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer