Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: The actual truth is that ...
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 08:01:04 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 66
Message-ID: <veggag$lk27$10@dont-email.me>
References: <ve39pb$24k00$1@dont-email.me> <ve8289$336c8$1@dont-email.me>
 <ve91hf$1ab4$1@news.muc.de>
 <7959253e834d2861b27ab7b3881619c2017e199f.camel@gmail.com>
 <ve9ju2$3ar6j$1@dont-email.me>
 <a965e0f825570212334deda4a92cd7489c33c687@i2pn2.org>
 <vea0mi$3cg0k$2@dont-email.me>
 <a4d0f7ff8798ce118247147d7d0385028ae44168@i2pn2.org>
 <veb557$3lbkf$2@dont-email.me>
 <2e6d8fc76e4e70decca1df44f49b338e61cc557e@i2pn2.org>
 <vebchp$3m87o$1@dont-email.me>
 <1071eb58637e27c9b2b99052ddb14701a147d23a@i2pn2.org>
 <vebeu2$3mp5v$1@dont-email.me>
 <58fef4e221da8d8bc3c274b9ee4d6b7b5dd82990@i2pn2.org>
 <vebmta$3nqde$1@dont-email.me>
 <99541b6e95dc30204bf49057f8f4c4496fbcc3db@i2pn2.org>
 <vedb3s$3g3a$1@dont-email.me> <vedibm$4891$2@dont-email.me>
 <72315c1456c399b2121b3fffe90b933be73e39b6@i2pn2.org>
 <veeh55$8jnq$2@dont-email.me>
 <0858883d537a7b088992d5eb2e066e13418f3843@i2pn2.org>
 <veeuje$bf9q$3@dont-email.me> <vefvkj$k1d1$1@dont-email.me>
 <c118b1b46462de7703f8b4d6b22fe6dac0571070@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 15:01:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4dff4ea9256eef2f131620d81ba94869";
	logging-data="708679"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+MDMP4W7eJcFFWwwL8g+8l"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9k0ZpZ2yXXqTKYqBkfXms6XQMo4=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <c118b1b46462de7703f8b4d6b22fe6dac0571070@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 4822

On 10/13/2024 7:48 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 10/13/24 4:16 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-10-12 22:52:30 +0000, olcott said:
>>
>>> On 10/12/2024 5:12 PM, joes wrote:
>>>> Am Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:03:01 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>>> On 10/12/2024 9:43 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/12/24 6:17 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>> On 10/12/2024 3:13 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-11 21:13:18 +0000, joes said:
>>>>>>>>> Am Fri, 11 Oct 2024 12:22:50 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/11/2024 12:11 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/11/24 11:06 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/11/2024 9:54 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/11/24 10:26 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/11/2024 8:05 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/11/24 8:19 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/11/2024 6:04 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/24 9:57 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2024 8:39 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/24 6:19 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2024 2:26 PM, wij wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 2024-10-10 at 17:05 +0000, Alan Mackenzie 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> When HHH is an x86 emulation based termination analyzer then each 
>>>>>>> DDD
>>>>>>> emulated by any HHH that it calls never returns.
>>>>>> Nope, Even software Engineering treats the funciton HHH as part of 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> program DDD, and termination analysis as looking at properties of the
>>>>>> whole program, not a partial emulation of it.
>>>>> So if we ask the exact question can DDD emulated by any HHH reach its
>>>>> own return statement they would answer the counter-factual yes?
>>>> Yes. DDD reaches it, so a purported simulator should as well.
>>>> Therefore HHH is not a simulator.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I tried to tell ChatGPT the same thing several times
>>> and it would not accept this.
>>> https://chatgpt.com/share/6709e046-4794-8011-98b7-27066fb49f3e
>>>
>>> Although LLM system are prone to lying: If it told a lie
>>> there would be an error that could be found in its reasoning.
>>
>> Not necessarily in the reasoning. The error could also be in the input
>> material.
>>
> 
> Right, like you claim that HHH can correctly answer based on its limited 
> knowledge even if that answer is wrong.
> 
> You TOLD IT that lying was ok.

See new post:
[ChatGPT refutes the key rebuttal of my work]
I only told ChatGPT the source-code for DDD
and the design of HHH.

You don't want to try to find any mistake that
it made because you know that you will lose.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer