Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vegv5r$ofj1$5@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: OT: Obama Upsets Black Conservatives
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 17:14:35 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <vegv5r$ofj1$5@dont-email.me>
References: <veeng2$9mrv$2@dont-email.me>
	<5bongjdud0nta8p4cg85b59oheht3fsnfk@4ax.com> <vegt0a$ofj1$1@dont-email.me>
	<i2vngj52i06tao6b5faoudl9on9f4evn9g@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 19:14:36 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="55a35ec646eedbfc987c24eb757f565a";
	logging-data="802401"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/iwJBonmVnhpUksc15b8lLKG07cdjrdXA="
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:h9LmNu0lRFS2t6R/aZl1th9GDAs=
Bytes: 3026

On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 10:01:20 -0700, john larkin wrote:

> On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 16:37:30 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
> <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
> 
>>On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 08:14:19 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 20:51:14 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
>>> <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>This clip is hilarious.
>>>>
>>>>Obama tries to tell the "bruthas" they're not entitled to have
>>>>aspirations. Their role is to be victims of Old Whitey and to
>>>>obediently vote Democrat because they'll never amount to anything,
>>>>that's all they're fit for and how dare they wish for something better
>>>>for themselves and their families.
>>>>
>>>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GzKlaNOA-k
>>>>
>>>>Not so eloquent when unscripted and doesn't have an auto-cue! :-D
>>> 
>>> I don't entirely understand his little lecture. Is he saying that
>>> black men should vote for Harris because she's black (and she is even
>>> less black than he is) or is he saying that black men should vote for
>>> a woman to prove that they are not black?
>>
>>The first part is the key. He's saying that Harris shares the same
>>values as they do (she doesn't). She comes from the same background as
>>they do (she doesn't). She's suffered the same discrimination as they
>>have (she hasn't). And so on. But they're not falling for it. I wanted
>>to post the follow-ups to this clip on Twitter from black voters. They
>>were without exception hostile. Zero hedge featured them in case anyona
>>actually GaS. Black conservatives (god bless 'em) are not fooled by
>>Obama and in fact feel decidedly insulted by him. His little lecture
>>backfired spectacularly! :-D
>>
>>
> Maybe some day we can get past the tribal idea of having "black values."

That would be nice. However, it's a core principle of the Democrats that 
blacks must always be oppressed - whether they are or not!