Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: constexpr keyword is unnecessary
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 14:39:41 -0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <veh0ks$p3c4$1@dont-email.me>
References: <veb5fi$3ll7j$1@dont-email.me>
 <vebp8r$3ok6d$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vebpo5$3olu3$1@dont-email.me>
 <vebtjp$3p9sm$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vebubq$3p8oj$1@dont-email.me> <20241013093902.884@kylheku.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 19:39:41 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b9d5dd9688ffdaba1d061cdfa3066275";
	logging-data="822660"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Hq4rTLHCY5+z/hrmM/m/GQ30S0GCWh3A="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:H76JOvwR/WMDRivvN0qq5Oz10jY=
In-Reply-To: <20241013093902.884@kylheku.com>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 1857

Em 10/13/2024 1:39 PM, Kaz Kylheku escreveu:
> On 2024-10-11, Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> wrote:
>> What I am suggesting again is remove the keyword constexpr. make const
>> do that.
>>
>> Just to remember C++ was already like that before constexpr. In c++
>> const could be used as constant expressions.
> 
> Really?
> 
>    const int f(int x) { ... }
> 
> says that calls to f can be evaluated at compile time?
> 

I am comparing what C have so far. Only variables not functions.

Sample

const int s = 4;
int a[s];

This was always valid in C++.