Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vehaq5$qqko$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 20:33:10 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <vehaq5$qqko$1@dont-email.me>
References: <uu54la$3su5b$6@dont-email.me> <87edbtz43p.fsf@tudado.org>
	<0d2cnVzOmbD6f4z7nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
	<uusur7$2hm6p$1@dont-email.me> <vdf096$2c9hb$8@dont-email.me>
	<87a5fdj7f2.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com>
	<ve83q2$33dfe$1@dont-email.me>
	<87wmighu4i.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com>
	<ve8s6d$3725r$1@dont-email.me>
	<87o73rj3sr.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com>
	<20241010120827.867@kylheku.com>
	<87frp3itsk.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com>
	<ve9mrh$3aiao$2@dont-email.me>
	<87jzee3ded.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com>
	<vebffc$3n6jv$1@dont-email.me> <vec3hi$3q4ms$2@dont-email.me>
	<vedcp9$3nu6$1@dont-email.me> <veepfs$ao2d$1@dont-email.me>
	<veg00t$k32c$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 22:33:10 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bdad28333359187bd11267218b038e9c";
	logging-data="879256"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19jp4oRxI5iew5zSRoPh2dv"
User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:YDJIx64DaP+dzGztJW4/mnEytUc=
Bytes: 2504

On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 08:22:53 -0000 (UTC), Muttley boring babbled:

> On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 21:25:17 -0000 (UTC)
> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 08:42:17 -0000 (UTC), Muttley boring babbled:
>>
>>> Code generated by a compiler does not require an interpreter.
>>
>>Something has to implement the rules of the “machine language”. This is
>>why we use the term “abstract machine”, to avoid having to distinguish
>>between “hardware” and “software”.
>>
>>Think: modern CPUs typically have “microcode” and “firmware” associated
>>with them. Are those “hardware” or “software”?
> 
> Who cares what happens inside the CPU hardware?

Because that’s where your “software” runs.