| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vehaq5$qqko$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 20:33:10 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 19 Message-ID: <vehaq5$qqko$1@dont-email.me> References: <uu54la$3su5b$6@dont-email.me> <87edbtz43p.fsf@tudado.org> <0d2cnVzOmbD6f4z7nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <uusur7$2hm6p$1@dont-email.me> <vdf096$2c9hb$8@dont-email.me> <87a5fdj7f2.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com> <ve83q2$33dfe$1@dont-email.me> <87wmighu4i.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com> <ve8s6d$3725r$1@dont-email.me> <87o73rj3sr.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com> <20241010120827.867@kylheku.com> <87frp3itsk.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com> <ve9mrh$3aiao$2@dont-email.me> <87jzee3ded.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com> <vebffc$3n6jv$1@dont-email.me> <vec3hi$3q4ms$2@dont-email.me> <vedcp9$3nu6$1@dont-email.me> <veepfs$ao2d$1@dont-email.me> <veg00t$k32c$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 22:33:10 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bdad28333359187bd11267218b038e9c"; logging-data="879256"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19jp4oRxI5iew5zSRoPh2dv" User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:YDJIx64DaP+dzGztJW4/mnEytUc= Bytes: 2504 On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 08:22:53 -0000 (UTC), Muttley boring babbled: > On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 21:25:17 -0000 (UTC) > Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: >> >>On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 08:42:17 -0000 (UTC), Muttley boring babbled: >> >>> Code generated by a compiler does not require an interpreter. >> >>Something has to implement the rules of the “machine language”. This is >>why we use the term “abstract machine”, to avoid having to distinguish >>between “hardware” and “software”. >> >>Think: modern CPUs typically have “microcode” and “firmware” associated >>with them. Are those “hardware” or “software”? > > Who cares what happens inside the CPU hardware? Because that’s where your “software” runs.