Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: ChatGPT explains why rebuttals of my work are incorrect
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 21:57:30 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 59
Message-ID: <vei1aq$11jh4$1@dont-email.me>
References: <veco64$hk5$4@dont-email.me> <vecrqv$1bav$2@dont-email.me>
 <vedfnq$43kg$1@dont-email.me> <veef3v$93ft$1@dont-email.me>
 <veeinu$9l7s$1@dont-email.me> <20241013093342.546@kylheku.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 04:57:30 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f8f20fff893307cbfb842dac28fd5b36";
	logging-data="1101348"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19U0i7vGKoOHXvUXuA0oJyY"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:KcTnjpFcEWGXTPxuaWUtQTkCsuk=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <20241013093342.546@kylheku.com>

On 10/13/2024 11:34 AM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
> On 2024-10-12, Chris M. Thomasson <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 10/12/2024 11:28 AM, Janis Papanagnou wrote:
>>> On 12.10.2024 11:32, Jan van den Broek wrote:
>>>> 2024-10-12, Chris M. Thomasson <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> schrieb:
>>>>> On 10/11/2024 7:50 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [Schnipp]
>>>>
>>>> As I see it, the main Halting Problem is Olcott not halting.
>>>
>>> LOL! - A very nice one. Thanks for that. :-)
>>
>> I second that. :^)
> 
> You're likely thousand-seconding that. The Olcott not halting joke
> is many years old now, and will likely come up again.
> 
> 

My cancer has gotten worse.

*ChatGPT explains why rebuttals of my work are incorrect*
https://chatgpt.com/share/6709e046-4794-8011-98b7-27066fb49f3e

I had to dumb this down from the original halting problem
input so that reviewers can verify that HHH is correct
without hardly paying any attention at all:

void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}

When HHH is an x86 emulation based termination analyzer
then each DDD emulated by any HHH that it calls never returns.

Each of the directly executed HHH emulator/analyzers that returns
0 correctly reports the above non-terminating behavior of its input.

*Fully operational code is here*
https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c
https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm

*Here is the original (not dumbed down) version*
from line 1345 of the above source file

int DD(int (*x)())
{
   int Halt_Status = H(x, x);
   if (Halt_Status)
     HERE: goto HERE;
   return Halt_Status;
}

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer