Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Muttley@DastartdlyHQ.org
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 08:25:37 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <veiki1$14g6h$1@dont-email.me>
References: <uu54la$3su5b$6@dont-email.me> <vegmul$ne3v$1@dont-email.me> <vegp1r$oqh$1@reader1.panix.com> <vegqu5$o3ve$1@dont-email.me> <veh9ph$fl2$1@reader1.panix.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:25:37 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f4e8605d1a482459fedfaef44a859ddc";
	logging-data="1196241"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/75pqXZ30NL0myJcZ50u9Y"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6hMt2AfsSb7qQf4rnvp4kIrA6bc=
Bytes: 1619

On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 20:15:45 -0000 (UTC)
cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) boring babbled:
>In article <vegqu5$o3ve$1@dont-email.me>,  <Muttley@DastartdlyHQ.org> wrote:

[tl;dr]

>The people who create the field are the ones who get to make
>the defintiions, not you.

ITYF people in the field as a whole make the definitions. 

>>Machine code isn't a language. Fallen at the first hurdle with that 
>>definition.
>
>Oh really?  Is that why they call it "machine language"?  It's
>even in the dictionary with "machine code" as a synonymn:
>https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/machine%20language

Its not a programming language.