| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<veis6b$desj$5@solani.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions? (infinitary) Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 12:35:56 +0200 Message-ID: <veis6b$desj$5@solani.org> References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org> <vdua6f$18vqi$2@dont-email.me> <vdubg3$24me$1@news.muc.de> <4bc3b086-247a-4547-89cc-1d47f502659d@tha.de> <ve0n4i$1vps$1@news.muc.de> <ve10qb$1p7ge$1@dont-email.me> <ve117p$vob$1@news.muc.de> <ve315q$24f8f$3@dont-email.me> <ve46vu$324$2@news.muc.de> <ve5u2i$2jobg$4@dont-email.me> <ve6329$19d5$1@news.muc.de> <ve64kl$2m0nm$4@dont-email.me> <ve66f3$19d5$2@news.muc.de> <ve683o$6c2o$1@solani.org> <ve6a23$19d5$3@news.muc.de> <ve6c3b$6esq$2@solani.org> <ve6kl1$207d$1@news.muc.de> <ve96jj$38qui$2@dont-email.me> <57bac4ef6ac73be7cfd418e24d896d09d407720c@i2pn2.org> <vea5f8$3gcbh$1@dont-email.me> <785289fa9737462db1d2a73b9018779f561eaa8c@i2pn2.org> <3a377d5f-7dd3-4caa-aa7a-5c76bb70966e@att.net> <veefog$97l4$1@dont-email.me> <07d13bc52b7dce927aa7f63df631d1cd4d4ed5a7@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:56 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: solani.org; logging-data="441235"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:xHIC3jfdTid+VHx//Xkt3OfaF5w= X-User-ID: eJwVytEVwEAEBMCWJFirHJzrv4S8zPe44sGEwWF+/WaiS4InwEQAVYwd1ddc3NaL2JW/KxV0vT1dL+WQnfMBKtkUnQ== Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <07d13bc52b7dce927aa7f63df631d1cd4d4ed5a7@i2pn2.org> Bytes: 2592 Lines: 22 On 12.10.2024 22:47, Richard Damon wrote: > On 10/12/24 2:39 PM, WM wrote: >> On 11.10.2024 20:02, Jim Burns wrote: >> >>> "Potential ℕ" vs. "actual ℕ" leaves unchanged >>> which claims we reason to. >> >> Potential infinity: All natural numbers when double yield natural >> numbers but larger numbers are among the result. >> In actual infinity no new naturals can be created but since doubling >> doubles the value of each number, numbers of the second number class >> are created. > No, in actual infinity no new natural can be created, True. > but every natural > number can find the one that is twice itself in the set, False. n*2 > n for all numbers, even for infinite numbers. Regards, WM