Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<veis6b$desj$5@solani.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit
 fractions? (infinitary)
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 12:35:56 +0200
Message-ID: <veis6b$desj$5@solani.org>
References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org> <vdua6f$18vqi$2@dont-email.me>
 <vdubg3$24me$1@news.muc.de> <4bc3b086-247a-4547-89cc-1d47f502659d@tha.de>
 <ve0n4i$1vps$1@news.muc.de> <ve10qb$1p7ge$1@dont-email.me>
 <ve117p$vob$1@news.muc.de> <ve315q$24f8f$3@dont-email.me>
 <ve46vu$324$2@news.muc.de> <ve5u2i$2jobg$4@dont-email.me>
 <ve6329$19d5$1@news.muc.de> <ve64kl$2m0nm$4@dont-email.me>
 <ve66f3$19d5$2@news.muc.de> <ve683o$6c2o$1@solani.org>
 <ve6a23$19d5$3@news.muc.de> <ve6c3b$6esq$2@solani.org>
 <ve6kl1$207d$1@news.muc.de> <ve96jj$38qui$2@dont-email.me>
 <57bac4ef6ac73be7cfd418e24d896d09d407720c@i2pn2.org>
 <vea5f8$3gcbh$1@dont-email.me>
 <785289fa9737462db1d2a73b9018779f561eaa8c@i2pn2.org>
 <3a377d5f-7dd3-4caa-aa7a-5c76bb70966e@att.net> <veefog$97l4$1@dont-email.me>
 <07d13bc52b7dce927aa7f63df631d1cd4d4ed5a7@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:56 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="441235"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xHIC3jfdTid+VHx//Xkt3OfaF5w=
X-User-ID: eJwVytEVwEAEBMCWJFirHJzrv4S8zPe44sGEwWF+/WaiS4InwEQAVYwd1ddc3NaL2JW/KxV0vT1dL+WQnfMBKtkUnQ==
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <07d13bc52b7dce927aa7f63df631d1cd4d4ed5a7@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 2592
Lines: 22

On 12.10.2024 22:47, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 10/12/24 2:39 PM, WM wrote:
>> On 11.10.2024 20:02, Jim Burns wrote:
>>
>>> "Potential ℕ" vs. "actual ℕ" leaves unchanged
>>> which claims we reason to.
>>
>> Potential infinity: All natural numbers when double yield natural 
>> numbers but larger numbers are among the result.
>> In actual infinity no new naturals can be created but since doubling 
>> doubles the value of each number, numbers of the second number class 
>> are created.

> No, in actual infinity no new natural can be created,

True.

> but every natural 
> number can find the one that is twice itself in the set,

False. n*2 > n for all numbers, even for infinite numbers.

Regards, WM