Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 16:09:29 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 83
Message-ID: <vej8mp$17p53$1@dont-email.me>
References: <veb5ci$3lksa$1@tor.dont-email.me> <670a46ee$1$19784$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <2abdfff7010153ad2ffb5d46231876aa@www.novabbs.com> <veg85o$l8v8$1@dont-email.me> <58b4369399a011ad461976139153a094@www.novabbs.com> <670ce917$0$3232$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 16:09:30 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8c018023c5dfe8a181e1429060ad4b67";
	logging-data="1303715"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18C0+OV8WoxzsXK0BgtQ8Jm8ppUdNbE/Ac="
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:gVR/JmKdAWEujMvdHI4EKg5g5jI=
Bytes: 4710

On 2024-10-14 09:49:11 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:

> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 10:42:00 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2024-10-13 01:01:03 +0000, Bertietaylor said:
>>> 
>>>> On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 9:52:47 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Aether Regained <AetherRegaind@somewhere.in.the.aether> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> bertietaylor:
>>>>>>> The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
>>>>>>> Arindam Banerjee,
>>>>>>> HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
>>>>>>> 10 Nov 2023
>>>>>>> (All rights reserved)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into
>>>>>>> near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6pjy0Wvujs&t=19s
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating
>>>>>>> inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and
>>>>>>> imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idsIuzEajTc&t=2s
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> @Arindam (there is no need to use the transparent bertietaylor alias):
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If the aether is fluid-like, which I believe it to be, as opposed to
>>>>>> your belief that the aether is solid-like, then there is a simple
>>>>>> disproof of your "violation of inertia" claim:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> There is no violation of inertia or conservation-of-momentum in fluid
>>>>>> mechanics: any unseen/unaccounted for momentum is carried away by the
>>>>>> fluid!
>>>>> 
>>>>> As 'everybody' in the 19th century already knew:
>>>>> the aether must be solid-like.
>>>>> A fluid aether cannot support transversverse waves,
>>>>> and this is what electromagnetic waves obviously are.
>>>>> 
>>>>> As for Woofster's claims about inertia violations:
>>>>> they are bunk, with or without an aether,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jan
>>>> 
>>>> Another e=mcc chap denying reality of inertia violation by Arindam's
>>>> rail gun experiment.
>>> 
>>> Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?
>> 
>> Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?
> 
> Nothing has been done until it has generated some peer approval,
> or at least a tiny bit of peer interest,

Right. Let us suppose (a huge supposition, and almost certainly false) 
that Arindam's inertia violation turns out to be correct. Will he get 
credit for it? No, the discovery will be attributed in the textbooks to 
the scientist who described and discussed it in a serious journal. The 
best he can hope for is a footnote saying "Banerjee claimed some years 
earlier in popular science sources that inertia violation could occur, 
but he provided no verifiable evidence of the claim." I'm reminded of 
Marie Mikhailovna Manasseïn: few people today have heard of her, and of 
those few virtually none accept her claim to have discovered cell-free 
fermentation 15 or so years before Eduard Buchner. OK, her results were 
published in a serious journal (Ber. dt. Chem. Ges. (1872)), but her 
experiments were unverifiable, and were very badly designed.

-- 
Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 37 years; mainly 
in England until 1987.