Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<veji5q$6s3$1@reader1.panix.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.spitfire.i.gajendra.net!not-for-mail From: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 16:51:06 -0000 (UTC) Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC Message-ID: <veji5q$6s3$1@reader1.panix.com> References: <uu54la$3su5b$6@dont-email.me> <veiki1$14g6h$1@dont-email.me> <vej6rs$1d4$1@reader1.panix.com> <vejauu$186ln$1@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 16:51:06 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="spitfire.i.gajendra.net:166.84.136.80"; logging-data="7043"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Originator: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) Bytes: 1844 Lines: 26 In article <vejauu$186ln$1@dont-email.me>, <Muttley@DastartdlyHQ.org> wrote: >On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 13:38:04 -0000 (UTC) >cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) boring babbled: >>[snip] >>|No. It translates one computer _language_ to another computer >>|_language_. In the usual case, that's from a textual source >> >>Note that I said, "computer language", not "programming >>language". Being a human-readable language is not a requirement >>for a computer language. > >Oh watch those goalpost moves with pedant set to 11. Presumably you >think the values of the address lines is a language too. Dunno what to tell you: pretty sure you're the one who asserted I meant something something I didn't write. >>Your claim that "machine language" is not a "language" is simply >>not true. Your claim that a "proper" compiler must take the >>shape you are pushing is also not true. > >If you say so. Not just me. - Dan C.