Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <veji5q$6s3$1@reader1.panix.com>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<veji5q$6s3$1@reader1.panix.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.spitfire.i.gajendra.net!not-for-mail
From: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 16:51:06 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID: <veji5q$6s3$1@reader1.panix.com>
References: <uu54la$3su5b$6@dont-email.me> <veiki1$14g6h$1@dont-email.me> <vej6rs$1d4$1@reader1.panix.com> <vejauu$186ln$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 16:51:06 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="spitfire.i.gajendra.net:166.84.136.80";
	logging-data="7043"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Bytes: 1844
Lines: 26

In article <vejauu$186ln$1@dont-email.me>,  <Muttley@DastartdlyHQ.org> wrote:
>On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 13:38:04 -0000 (UTC)
>cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) boring babbled:
>>[snip]
>>|No.  It translates one computer _language_ to another computer
>>|_language_.  In the usual case, that's from a textual source
>>
>>Note that I said, "computer language", not "programming
>>language".  Being a human-readable language is not a requirement
>>for a computer language.
>
>Oh watch those goalpost moves with pedant set to 11. Presumably you
>think the values of the address lines is a language too.

Dunno what to tell you: pretty sure you're the one who
asserted I meant something something I didn't write.

>>Your claim that "machine language" is not a "language" is simply
>>not true.  Your claim that a "proper" compiler must take the
>>shape you are pushing is also not true.
>
>If you say so.

Not just me.

	- Dan C.