Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: ChatGPT explains why rebuttals of my work are incorrect
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 17:23:29 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 60
Message-ID: <vekcm2$1cidd$3@dont-email.me>
References: <veco64$hk5$4@dont-email.me> <vecrqv$1bav$2@dont-email.me>
 <vedfnq$43kg$1@dont-email.me> <veef3v$93ft$1@dont-email.me>
 <veeinu$9l7s$1@dont-email.me> <20241013093342.546@kylheku.com>
 <vei1aq$11jh4$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 02:23:30 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="622b3858c7e397e9bc334577319143ad";
	logging-data="1460653"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19YEICP1Xi16eIuWgexzTJZ2kGAbZpeIzk="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:tIXhtjyjXFhHhveEaD1pjxqAyYI=
In-Reply-To: <vei1aq$11jh4$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US

On 10/13/2024 7:57 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 10/13/2024 11:34 AM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>> On 2024-10-12, Chris M. Thomasson <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 10/12/2024 11:28 AM, Janis Papanagnou wrote:
>>>> On 12.10.2024 11:32, Jan van den Broek wrote:
>>>>> 2024-10-12, Chris M. Thomasson <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 
>>>>> schrieb:
>>>>>> On 10/11/2024 7:50 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> [Schnipp]
>>>>>
>>>>> As I see it, the main Halting Problem is Olcott not halting.
>>>>
>>>> LOL! - A very nice one. Thanks for that. :-)
>>>
>>> I second that. :^)
>>
>> You're likely thousand-seconding that. The Olcott not halting joke
>> is many years old now, and will likely come up again.
>>
>>
> 
> My cancer has gotten worse.
> 
> *ChatGPT explains why rebuttals of my work are incorrect*
> https://chatgpt.com/share/6709e046-4794-8011-98b7-27066fb49f3e
> 
> I had to dumb this down from the original halting problem
> input so that reviewers can verify that HHH is correct
> without hardly paying any attention at all:
> 
> void DDD()
> {
>    HHH(DDD);
>    return;
> }
> 
> When HHH is an x86 emulation based termination analyzer
> then each DDD emulated by any HHH that it calls never returns.
> 
> Each of the directly executed HHH emulator/analyzers that returns
> 0 correctly reports the above non-terminating behavior of its input.
> 
> *Fully operational code is here*
> https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c
> https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm
> 
> *Here is the original (not dumbed down) version*
> from line 1345 of the above source file
> 
> int DD(int (*x)())
> {
>    int Halt_Status = H(x, x);
>    if (Halt_Status)
>      HERE: goto HERE;
>    return Halt_Status;
> }
> 

Can you put up a full blown MSVC solution that works on GitHub?