Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.in-chemnitz.de!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: constexpr keyword is unnecessary
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 23:30:10 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <veknk0$1icjf$1@dont-email.me>
References: <veb5fi$3ll7j$1@dont-email.me>
 <vebp8r$3ok6d$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vebpo5$3olu3$1@dont-email.me>
 <vebtjp$3p9sm$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vebubq$3p8oj$1@dont-email.me>
 <vecuhe$1o44$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vedt8k$64du$1@dont-email.me>
 <veduu9$6eql$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <veeq6a$ar0c$1@dont-email.me>
 <veg8m7$laio$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 05:30:09 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7687e8f1c66d535999c161cfa22e1e83";
	logging-data="1651311"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+kduXrs9eoKZEG12tSDIZa"
User-Agent: Betterbird (Windows)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DNAcnkEO/d7YfX9+jvoqbdDDZ8c=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <veg8m7$laio$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
Bytes: 1899

On 10/13/2024 6:51 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
> Am 12.10.2024 um 23:37 schrieb Thiago Adams:
> 
>> If you are afraid your constant is not constant expression put a 
>> static_assert. Then remove.
> 
> This is unnecessary work if you have constexpr.
> 
>> (C++ is a TOTAL mess. const in C++ already could be used n constant 
>> expression)
> 
> C++ is five to ten times less work for the same problem.


How do you measure "work'?