Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:29:15 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 91
Message-ID: <vel5kb$1kf34$1@dont-email.me>
References: <veb5ci$3lksa$1@tor.dont-email.me> <670a46ee$1$19784$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <2abdfff7010153ad2ffb5d46231876aa@www.novabbs.com> <veg85o$l8v8$1@dont-email.me> <58b4369399a011ad461976139153a094@www.novabbs.com> <670ce917$0$3232$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <vej8mp$17p53$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:29:15 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7eb595ef5e34a65c6577209f0e9c4654";
	logging-data="1719396"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+TSloomv04C/P+XMMY1mYfMQun5CxksIM="
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:JJykxdfa2DRfOqFsU24A9HnS8vE=
Bytes: 5079

On 2024-10-14 14:09:29 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden said:

> On 2024-10-14 09:49:11 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:
> 
>> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 10:42:00 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 2024-10-13 01:01:03 +0000, Bertietaylor said:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 9:52:47 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Aether Regained <AetherRegaind@somewhere.in.the.aether> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> bertietaylor:
>>>>>>>> The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
>>>>>>>> Arindam Banerjee,
>>>>>>>> HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
>>>>>>>> 10 Nov 2023
>>>>>>>> (All rights reserved)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into
>>>>>>>> near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6pjy0Wvujs&t=19s
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating
>>>>>>>> inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and
>>>>>>>> imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idsIuzEajTc&t=2s
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> @Arindam (there is no need to use the transparent bertietaylor alias):
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If the aether is fluid-like, which I believe it to be, as opposed to
>>>>>>> your belief that the aether is solid-like, then there is a simple
>>>>>>> disproof of your "violation of inertia" claim:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> There is no violation of inertia or conservation-of-momentum in fluid
>>>>>>> mechanics: any unseen/unaccounted for momentum is carried away by the
>>>>>>> fluid!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> As 'everybody' in the 19th century already knew:
>>>>>> the aether must be solid-like.
>>>>>> A fluid aether cannot support transversverse waves,
>>>>>> and this is what electromagnetic waves obviously are.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> As for Woofster's claims about inertia violations:
>>>>>> they are bunk, with or without an aether,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Jan
>>>>> 
>>>>> Another e=mcc chap denying reality of inertia violation by Arindam's
>>>>> rail gun experiment.
>>>> 
>>>> Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?
>>> 
>>> Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?
>> 
>> Nothing has been done until it has generated some peer approval,
>> or at least a tiny bit of peer interest,
> 
> Right. Let us suppose (a huge supposition, and almost certainly false) 
> that Arindam's inertia violation turns out to be correct. Will he get 
> credit for it? No, the discovery will be attributed in the textbooks to 
> the scientist who described and discussed it in a serious journal. The 
> best he can hope for is a footnote saying "Banerjee claimed some years 
> earlier in popular science sources that inertia violation could occur, 
> but he provided no verifiable evidence of the claim." I'm reminded of 
> Marie Mikhailovna Manasseïn: few people today have heard of her, and of 
> those few virtually none accept her claim to have discovered cell-free 
> fermentation 15

25. I'm not getting any younger, and arithmetic that would have once 
been utterly trivial is now error-prone.

>  or so years before Eduard Buchner. OK, her results were published in a 
> serious journal (Ber. dt. Chem. Ges. (1872)), but her experiments were 
> unverifiable, and were very badly designed.


-- 
Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 37 years; mainly 
in England until 1987.