| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vel9ct$1l118$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: ChatGPT refutes the key rebuttal of my work Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 11:33:33 +0300 Organization: - Lines: 34 Message-ID: <vel9ct$1l118$1@dont-email.me> References: <vegfro$lk27$9@dont-email.me> <veimqs$14que$1@dont-email.me> <veipf3$15764$1@dont-email.me> <36ecdefcca730806c7bd9ec03e326fac1a9c8464@i2pn2.org> <vejcoj$1879f$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 10:33:34 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f76a410d37d03fdaebf88092050c0659"; logging-data="1737768"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+7KcBrd1i+YkdvrHJ2rS1w" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:nkWdDs8bSvc3FczvA96He/hJ7OE= Bytes: 2188 On 2024-10-14 15:18:43 +0000, olcott said: > On 10/14/2024 7:06 AM, joes wrote: >> Am Mon, 14 Oct 2024 04:49:22 -0500 schrieb olcott: >>> On 10/14/2024 4:04 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>> On 2024-10-13 12:53:12 +0000, olcott said: >>>> >>>>> Although it is possible for LLM systems to lie: >> >>>>> ChatGPT does correctly apply truth preserving operations to the >>>>> premises that it was provided regarding the behavior of DDD and HHH. >>>>> *Try to find a mistake in its reasoning* >>>> >>>> No reasoning shown. >>>> >>> https://chatgpt.com/share/6709e046-4794-8011-98b7-27066fb49f3e >>> When you click on the link and try to explain how HHH must be wrong when >>> it reports that DDD does not terminate because DDD does terminate it >>> will explain your mistake to you. >> It is nonsensical for HHH not to report that DDD terminates. >> > The explanation is quite good. I will take what you said > to mean that it was over your head or didn't bother to > look at it. > > You never confirmed that you even know what infinite > recursion is. Could you confirm that you know whether there is an infinite recursion in DDD? -- Mikko