Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<velpm2$1n3gb$6@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: ChatGPT refutes the key rebuttal of my work --- [ less than no
 rebuttal at all ]
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:11:30 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 76
Message-ID: <velpm2$1n3gb$6@dont-email.me>
References: <vegfro$lk27$9@dont-email.me> <veimqs$14que$1@dont-email.me>
 <veipf3$15764$1@dont-email.me>
 <36ecdefcca730806c7bd9ec03e326fac1a9c8464@i2pn2.org>
 <vejcoj$1879f$1@dont-email.me>
 <034767682966b9ac642993dd2fa0d181c21dfffc@i2pn2.org>
 <vekj4q$1hrgd$1@dont-email.me>
 <f8a15594bf0623a229214e2fb62ce4f4a2bd7116@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 15:11:31 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6ebbafc8de1d261770d7d4f83dd30cde";
	logging-data="1805835"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/BeHnzkteTCYsEzoiYqEFt"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/slOf8ruujT3Zeueef+8hpSPIIM=
In-Reply-To: <f8a15594bf0623a229214e2fb62ce4f4a2bd7116@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4156

On 10/15/2024 6:35 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 10/14/24 10:13 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 10/14/2024 6:50 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 10/14/24 11:18 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 10/14/2024 7:06 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>> Am Mon, 14 Oct 2024 04:49:22 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>> On 10/14/2024 4:04 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2024-10-13 12:53:12 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Although it is possible for LLM systems to lie:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ChatGPT does correctly apply truth preserving operations to the
>>>>>>>> premises that it was provided regarding the behavior of DDD and 
>>>>>>>> HHH.
>>>>>>>> *Try to find a mistake in its reasoning*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No reasoning shown.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://chatgpt.com/share/6709e046-4794-8011-98b7-27066fb49f3e
>>>>>> When you click on the link and try to explain how HHH must be 
>>>>>> wrong when
>>>>>> it reports that DDD does not terminate because DDD does terminate it
>>>>>> will explain your mistake to you.
>>>>> It is nonsensical for HHH not to report that DDD terminates.
>>>>>
>>>> The explanation is quite good. I will take what you said
>>>> to mean that it was over your head or didn't bother to
>>>> look at it.
>>>>
>>>> You never confirmed that you even know what infinite
>>>> recursion is.
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, he means your argument is just non-sense, and it is just a 
>>> blantant lie that you put forwards because you just don't understand 
>>> what you are talking about.,
>>
>> In other words you coward away from trying to convince
>> ChatGPT that is is incorrect.
> 
> What do you mean. With one statement I got it to admit that the ACTUAL 
> behavior of DDD was to halt.
> 
>>
>> Since you say that it is a YES man it should be easy
>> for you to get it to admit that it is wrong.
>>
> 
> Which I did,
> 
>> https://chatgpt.com/share/6709e046-4794-8011-98b7-27066fb49f3e
>>
>> When you click on the link and try to explain how HHH must
>> be wrong when it reports that DDD does not terminate because
>> DDD does terminate it will explain your mistake to you.
>>
> 
> I did that, and it admitted that DDD halts, it just tries to justify why 
> a wrong answer must be right.
> 

It explains in great detail that another different DDD
(same machine code different process context) seems to
terminate only because the recursive emulation that it
specifies has been aborted at its second recursive call.

You err because you fail to understand how the same
C/x86 function invoked in a different process context
can have different behavior.

A rebuttal anchored in failing to understand a key detail
is less than no rebuttal at all.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer