Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: The actual truth is that ... industry standard stipulative definitions
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 11:05:49 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <vens4t$250b2$1@dont-email.me>
References: <ve39pb$24k00$1@dont-email.me> <vebeu2$3mp5v$1@dont-email.me> <58fef4e221da8d8bc3c274b9ee4d6b7b5dd82990@i2pn2.org> <vebmta$3nqde$1@dont-email.me> <99541b6e95dc30204bf49057f8f4c4496fbcc3db@i2pn2.org> <vedb3s$3g3a$1@dont-email.me> <vedibm$4891$2@dont-email.me> <72315c1456c399b2121b3fffe90b933be73e39b6@i2pn2.org> <vee6s1$7l0f$1@dont-email.me> <1180775691cf24be4a082676bc531877147202e3@i2pn2.org> <veec23$8jnq$1@dont-email.me> <c81fcbf97a35bd428495b0e70f3b54e545e8ae59@i2pn2.org> <vef37r$bknp$2@dont-email.me> <7e79306e9771378b032e6832548eeef7429888c4@i2pn2.org> <veikaf$14fb3$1@dont-email.me> <veipmb$15764$2@dont-email.me> <c56fcfcf793d65bebd7d17db4fccafd1b8dea072@i2pn2.org> <vejfg0$1879f$3@dont-email.me> <bde5947ebdcfb62ecd6e8968052cb3a25c4b1fec@i2pn2.org> <vekfi5$1d7rn$1@dont-email.me> <6d73c2d966d1d04dcef8f7f9e0c849e17bd73352@i2pn2.org> <velnqn$1n3gb$3@dont-email.me> <b06c4952248d83881642c7d84207d3d39c56c59f@i2pn2.org> <vend90$22rqh$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 10:05:49 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4e667916d3a2e8260f05485b450479be";
	logging-data="2261346"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/fpXuyF2ByEFM4JalFg7+l"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DODP7tiIY9/Pm4xdmhBW1e3HrZQ=
Bytes: 3446

On 2024-10-16 03:52:00 +0000, olcott said:

> On 10/15/2024 9:11 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 10/15/24 8:39 AM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 10/15/2024 4:58 AM, joes wrote:
>>>> Am Mon, 14 Oct 2024 20:12:37 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>>> On 10/14/2024 6:50 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/14/24 12:05 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>> On 10/14/2024 6:21 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 10/14/24 5:53 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 10/14/2024 3:21 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-13 12:49:01 +0000, Richard Damon said:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/12/24 8:11 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>>> Trying to change to a different analytical framework than the one that
>>>>>>> I am stipulating is the strawman deception. *Essentially an
>>>>>>> intentional fallacy of equivocation error*
>>>>>> But, you claim to be working on that Halting Problem,
>>>>> I quit claiming this many messages ago and you didn't bother to notice.
>>>> Can you please give the date and time? Did you also explicitly disclaim
>>>> it or just silently leave it out?
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Even people of low intelligence that are not trying to
>>> be as disagreeable as possible would be able to notice
>>> that a specified C function is not a Turing machine.
>> 
>> But it needs to be computationally equivalent to one to ask about Termination.
>> 
> 
> Not at all.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_function
> A termination analyzer need not be a Turing computable function.

There is no known way to construct one that isn't. No computer can
execute a function that is not Turing computable.

-- 
Mikko