Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: ChatGPT refutes the key rebuttal of my work
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 11:39:38 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 59
Message-ID: <veoq8a$29dtl$5@dont-email.me>
References: <vegfro$lk27$9@dont-email.me> <veimqs$14que$1@dont-email.me>
 <veipf3$15764$1@dont-email.me>
 <36ecdefcca730806c7bd9ec03e326fac1a9c8464@i2pn2.org>
 <vejcoj$1879f$1@dont-email.me> <vel9ct$1l118$1@dont-email.me>
 <velorl$1n3gb$5@dont-email.me> <veopa8$2ameu$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 18:39:38 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f097d53e4abea8ea9babea4b430282e3";
	logging-data="2406325"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/XP1hFPhQA41Ruo7iQAdbI"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:HkzsIFJDkpZpo5wkGhkgipbgsW4=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <veopa8$2ameu$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3408

On 10/16/2024 11:23 AM, Mikko wrote:
> On 2024-10-15 12:57:25 +0000, olcott said:
> 
>> On 10/15/2024 3:33 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>> On 2024-10-14 15:18:43 +0000, olcott said:
>>>
>>>> On 10/14/2024 7:06 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>> Am Mon, 14 Oct 2024 04:49:22 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>> On 10/14/2024 4:04 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2024-10-13 12:53:12 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Although it is possible for LLM systems to lie:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ChatGPT does correctly apply truth preserving operations to the
>>>>>>>> premises that it was provided regarding the behavior of DDD and 
>>>>>>>> HHH.
>>>>>>>> *Try to find a mistake in its reasoning*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No reasoning shown.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://chatgpt.com/share/6709e046-4794-8011-98b7-27066fb49f3e
>>>>>> When you click on the link and try to explain how HHH must be 
>>>>>> wrong when
>>>>>> it reports that DDD does not terminate because DDD does terminate it
>>>>>> will explain your mistake to you.
>>>>> It is nonsensical for HHH not to report that DDD terminates.
>>>>>
>>>> The explanation is quite good. I will take what you said
>>>> to mean that it was over your head or didn't bother to
>>>> look at it.
>>>>
>>>> You never confirmed that you even know what infinite
>>>> recursion is.
>>>
>>> Could you confirm that you know whether there is an infinite recursion
>>> in DDD?
>>>
>>
>> Recursive emulation is isomorphic to recursion.
>>
>> The following is to be understood only within my
>> stipulative definitions of terms provided in my first
>> reply to you today.
>>
>> Recursive emulation that does not have a termination
>> condition within the c function under test is infinite.
>>
>> This refers to my stipulative definition of terms
>> provided in my first reply to you. To the best of my
>> knowledge these definitions are also industry standard.
> 
> This can be interpreted as an overly verbose 'No'.
> 

I will equally say that you are wrong.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer