Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: The actual truth is that ... industry standard stipulative
 definitions
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 12:13:12 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <veos78$29dtl$7@dont-email.me>
References: <ve39pb$24k00$1@dont-email.me>
 <58fef4e221da8d8bc3c274b9ee4d6b7b5dd82990@i2pn2.org>
 <vebmta$3nqde$1@dont-email.me>
 <99541b6e95dc30204bf49057f8f4c4496fbcc3db@i2pn2.org>
 <vedb3s$3g3a$1@dont-email.me> <vedibm$4891$2@dont-email.me>
 <72315c1456c399b2121b3fffe90b933be73e39b6@i2pn2.org>
 <vee6s1$7l0f$1@dont-email.me>
 <1180775691cf24be4a082676bc531877147202e3@i2pn2.org>
 <veec23$8jnq$1@dont-email.me>
 <c81fcbf97a35bd428495b0e70f3b54e545e8ae59@i2pn2.org>
 <vef37r$bknp$2@dont-email.me>
 <7e79306e9771378b032e6832548eeef7429888c4@i2pn2.org>
 <veikaf$14fb3$1@dont-email.me> <veipmb$15764$2@dont-email.me>
 <c56fcfcf793d65bebd7d17db4fccafd1b8dea072@i2pn2.org>
 <vejfg0$1879f$3@dont-email.me>
 <bde5947ebdcfb62ecd6e8968052cb3a25c4b1fec@i2pn2.org>
 <vekfi5$1d7rn$1@dont-email.me>
 <6d73c2d966d1d04dcef8f7f9e0c849e17bd73352@i2pn2.org>
 <velnqn$1n3gb$3@dont-email.me>
 <b06c4952248d83881642c7d84207d3d39c56c59f@i2pn2.org>
 <vend90$22rqh$1@dont-email.me> <vens4t$250b2$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 19:13:12 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f097d53e4abea8ea9babea4b430282e3";
	logging-data="2406325"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+QWM6XzSm+0XzBLu4hDgB2"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qfnHMVh79VLi26UreEMJtcLjtKo=
In-Reply-To: <vens4t$250b2$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3980

On 10/16/2024 3:05 AM, Mikko wrote:
> On 2024-10-16 03:52:00 +0000, olcott said:
> 
>> On 10/15/2024 9:11 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 10/15/24 8:39 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 10/15/2024 4:58 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>> Am Mon, 14 Oct 2024 20:12:37 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>> On 10/14/2024 6:50 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 10/14/24 12:05 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 10/14/2024 6:21 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 10/14/24 5:53 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/14/2024 3:21 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-13 12:49:01 +0000, Richard Damon said:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/12/24 8:11 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Trying to change to a different analytical framework than the 
>>>>>>>> one that
>>>>>>>> I am stipulating is the strawman deception. *Essentially an
>>>>>>>> intentional fallacy of equivocation error*
>>>>>>> But, you claim to be working on that Halting Problem,
>>>>>> I quit claiming this many messages ago and you didn't bother to 
>>>>>> notice.
>>>>> Can you please give the date and time? Did you also explicitly 
>>>>> disclaim
>>>>> it or just silently leave it out?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Even people of low intelligence that are not trying to
>>>> be as disagreeable as possible would be able to notice
>>>> that a specified C function is not a Turing machine.
>>>
>>> But it needs to be computationally equivalent to one to ask about 
>>> Termination.
>>>
>>
>> Not at all.
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_function
>> A termination analyzer need not be a Turing computable function.
> 
> There is no known way to construct one that isn't. No computer can
> execute a function that is not Turing computable.
> 

In other words you think that functions that
rely on global data such that they are not a
pure function of their inputs are A OK?

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer