Article <ver0s4$2oa7g$1@dont-email.me>

Deutsch English Français Italiano
<ver0s4$2oa7g$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: RonO <rokimoto557@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: CDC November research report on virus viability in pasteurized
 milk
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 07:44:53 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 58
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <ver0s4$2oa7g$1@dont-email.me>
References: <ve19d4$1qgcp$1@dont-email.me> <ve6l9j$2obr3$2@dont-email.me>
 <veof07$28nos$1@dont-email.me> <vephqq$2ele7$3@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: rokimoto557@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="67950"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8kJzd/i3oayvAu8HI5czzXoUE5w=
In-Reply-To: <vephqq$2ele7$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
	FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO,FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,
	USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.6
	smtp.eternal-september.org
Bytes: 5801

On 10/16/2024 6:22 PM, JTEM wrote:
>   RonO wrote:
> 
>> No news sources are commenting on the CDC findings that 
> 
> Get your vaccine and 19 booster shots.
> 
> It's just coincidence that a virus exactly mirrors the
> long term policy goals of eliminating beef & dairy from
> your diet. Remember of the ABCs of Gwobull Warbling:
> 
> Agree. Believe. Comply.
> 
> "Eat weed & maggot sausage, for the environment!"

You do not seem to understand what the situation is.  If anything the 
USDA and CDC are not doing what they should have been doing from the 
start of this issue because they want to protect the cattle industry. 
They are doing it at the expense of the poultry industry because there 
are more votes that need to be considered in the cattle industry than 
the poultry industry.  The price of eggs is going to go up because dairy 
herds have been infecting layer flocks, probably because they share 
workers.  Some dairy workers and their close contacts work at poultry 
farms.  They do not want to hurt the cattle industry economically, so 
they have downplayed the situation, and never have determined how bad 
the situation is (how many states have infected herds and how many 
infected herds there actually are).  They know that the best way to 
avoid the transition of influenza virus to being pathogenic to humans 
has been to reduce dairy worker infections, but they never tried to 
determine how many dairy workers were infected, and have just 
recommended that dairy workers use protective gear when working with 
infected animals.  They have never tried to identify all the infected 
herds so the dairy workers would know when they should be using 
protective gear.

Both agencies have just hoped that the virus will burn itself out before 
it transfers to humans, but California and Colorado indicates that they 
are very wrong.

The latest pasteurization data hasn't been made a big deal of because 
they do not want to economically damage the dairy industry.  The FDA 
knows that the virus can be found in milk in states that have not 
reported infected herds, and California indicates that a lot of infected 
milk is making it into dairy products.  They haven't identified all the 
infected herds yet, and they claim that infected cattle are not allowed 
to contributed to the milk sold by the dairy, but they have to identify 
the cows as infected.  They need to test every cow at infected dairies, 
and clear them before they are allowed to contribute to the milk supply. 
  The Texasd data that has been ignored by the CDC and USDA found that 
even though only 10% of a herd might be showing symptoms 64% of the 
samples tested from 2 farms were positive for the virus (they claimed to 
take the samples at random without regard to if the cow was showing 
symptoms or not), so even if the dairies have been taking out the cows 
with symptoms, most of the infected cows are still contributing to the 
milk supply.  Most states haven't even tried to identify their infected 
herds.

Ron Okimoto