Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of
 Succession
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 15:01:55 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 134
Message-ID: <vern01$2sb1f$1@dont-email.me>
References: <ve3er7$bc5$1@panix2.panix.com>
 <g1lagj1nisg9lcp7v86keo3ajmvfec6si6@4ax.com> <ve4p55$2givf$2@dont-email.me>
 <ou8dgjp2mtgu5jv93ml600u284ifrccfpn@4ax.com> <ve6frg$2o1c0$2@dont-email.me>
 <2gtfgj9p2r66h84afc2hfapm4l2gflac9b@4ax.com> <ve8vb8$37i5m$1@dont-email.me>
 <ve9vu6$3cd21$1@dont-email.me> <vebftp$3n8j2$1@dont-email.me>
 <ln2ujvFq0s8U1@mid.individual.net> <vejmnc$1a2l8$1@dont-email.me>
 <ln752kFf3t0U1@mid.individual.net> <vem0cj$1oeb0$1@dont-email.me>
 <ln9rsnFrkhqU1@mid.individual.net> <veoo5r$2afu4$1@dont-email.me>
 <lnalhfFusvU1@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 21:02:26 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9a4f597d8f5f3563873b2d243e73af25";
	logging-data="3025967"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/I3yZlqfVbG2x1WXrnvfEo"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.19
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+nTqvROfrBxr+TMdjKmQeQoKVOo=
In-Reply-To: <lnalhfFusvU1@mid.individual.net>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 241017-22, 10/17/2024), Outbound message
Bytes: 6724

Chris Buckley wrote:
> On 2024-10-16, William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Chris Buckley wrote:
>>> On 2024-10-15, William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Chris Buckley wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-10-14, William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Chris Buckley wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2024-10-11, William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Dimensional Traveler wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2024 9:28 AM, William Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Paul S Person wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> I also suspect a new District of Columbia will be established,
>>>>>>>>>>> probably in the middle of the country. Nothing like high mountains and
>>>>>>>>>>> a thousand miles or two of land to make a government feel secure.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Without, one hopes, disenfranchising a million Americans.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You can't be disenfranchised if you don't have the ability to vote in
>>>>>>>>> the first place.  ;)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As I understand it a number of people in Georgetown and other
>>>>>>>> settlements in what became DC were rather unhappy with their loss of
>>>>>>>> voting rights.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When I lived in DC someone published a few letters from the time as part
>>>>>>>> of the movement to enfranchise the residents of DC.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The issue in DC has not been about being able to vote for a long time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It certainly was when I lived there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Republicans have been floating plans to enfranchise DC residents for
>>>>>>> decades,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Only plans that will never come to fruition.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      but the local Democrats have been saying "no, we don't want
>>>>>>> to vote that much."  The Republican plans are to join DC and Maryland
>>>>>>> in some form, perhaps making the remaining DC part of Maryland
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maryland doesn't want them.  That's what makes the plan so perfect for
>>>>>> the Republicans. It won't happen but they can say that they are doing
>>>>>> something.
>>>>>
>>>>> Baloney!
>>>>
>>>> Reality.
>>>>
>>>> Look it up.  It's not popular in Maryland.
>>>
>>> Please give your citations.
>>   From the Washington Post, in 2019:
>>
>> "The Post-U. Md. poll finds Marylanders oppose making the District a new
>> county in their state, a plan called “retrocession,” by 57 percent to 36
>> percent. There is little variation depending on political party, with
>> majorities of Democrats, Republicans and independents all opposed."
>>
>> Other polls can be found supporting this.  It's not hard  to find.
> 
> That seems like an insignificant barrier to overcome,


More polls asking different questions can be found.  If you want to.


  given all the
> publicity in the previous years was about alternatives (the DC statehood
> referendum).  It's pretty close but especially insignificant when
> you consider the polls indicate only 20% support for retrocession
> among DC residents.  Maryland residents are almost twice as much in
> favor of it as DC residents!
> 
> I don't understand why you consider Maryland resident support, who don't
> get to vote on the issue, is more important than DC resident support, who
> do get to vote on the issue.

Can Maryland be compelled  to take DC back?  I'd be very surprised if 
that were so.

Can the federal government compel states to change their borders?  How 
interesting that would be.

Do the voters of DC actually have any legal rights in this?
> 
> And note that all of this is about Maryland actually re-annexing DC.
> The much more likely proposal (and the one the Republicans keep
> suggesting) is for DC residents to be able to vote as Maryland residents,
> but otherwise remain separate.

That would equally dilute their voting power.
> 
>>
>>>>> First, both DC and Maryland are heavily Democratic;
>>>>
>>>> Quite irrelevant.
>>>
>>> The issue is an intensely political issue.
>>
>>
>> If we can't rise above politics on an issue of fundamental rights, what
>> are we?
>>
>> To make my position clear:
>>
>> Reunion with Maryland would be fair.  Whether or not the citizens of DC
>> want it, it can be done.
> 
> ??? It can't be done without the citizens of DC approving 

As above, I'd be interested in the legal basis for this.  They were not 
asked to approve when the district was formed.

Article one, section eight, gives congress power over DC.  Congress 
regularly overturns laws passed by the city.

The voting rights act of 2007, which would have given some justice by 
allowing DC (and Utah, just to keep the political balance) a seat in the 
house did not pass a republican filibuster in the senate, gaining only 
57 votes.

A similar bill in 2009 did pass the senate, but only with a republican 
amendment requiring DC to abandon all gun-control legislation.  It died 
in the house.

I am not as sanguine about the republicans' good intentions as are you.



William Hyde