Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<veucd4$3ee7f$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Rich <rich@example.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Subject: Re: Inspired by Chris's HMAC cipher
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 19:20:04 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <veucd4$3ee7f$1@dont-email.me>
References: <d362d3df17bfa32425c931d333a3a53be0c31bd0@i2pn2.org> <ve1fqq$1r205$1@dont-email.me> <e21b4f8f4c4c60ee76caf01ad8b5a13a329ad51b@i2pn2.org> <3fdb83dbfe35a57d62d07ea352ccc53a9b6e01cf@i2pn2.org> <4742d35c14f5b945a681c331e6661d57e8bb8b96@i2pn2.org> <verr74$2stfq$2@dont-email.me> <7e059f0438e1e4be5778f2d7f83b8a94202a2149@i2pn2.org> <vesa0l$2v6q6$2@dont-email.me> <2894de1054fe9a8e4af84661b76d8b7d0cbd0e7b@i2pn2.org> <veu7qe$3dg3q$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 21:20:05 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d1d14d9579d54b54716110bffd0317f9";
	logging-data="3619055"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19rLxwKRASBzwJClQsyPull"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.1-20211226 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.139 (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EgHJdVKRFCH53Qraf0S9jjVx2VU=
Bytes: 2337

Chris M. Thomasson <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/18/2024 6:38 AM, Stefan Claas wrote:
>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>> On 10/17/2024 1:25 PM, Stefan Claas wrote:
>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>>> Yeah, I am only representing the ciphertext in hex right now for the
>>>>> online version. Now, I could modify it to encode the ciphetext in base
>>>>> 64 or something a little more "dense", so to speak... Fwiw, here is a
>>>>> link to a C based test version, have you seen it yet?
>>>>>
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.c/c/a53VxN8cwkY/m/XKl1-0a8DAAJ
>>>>>
>>>>> ;^)
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I remember that and I had compiler errors.
>>>
>>> You never got it compile with C99?
>> 
>> I tried with gcc and g++, but it is ok.
> 
> Well, what errors did you get? Many others were able to compile and run 
> it wrt encrypt and decrypt cycles on various plaintexts.

No makefile, so whether one gets C99 mode depends on what compiler 
version is being used, and upon whether they thought to explicitly 
indicate a version to compile against.