Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
Subject: Re: Multiple abuses from i2pn2.
Date: 18 Oct 2024 17:30:37 GMT
Organization: NOYB
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <veud09.ngk.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net>
References: <VWH_2ypup_sRKJJJHA6zPHlzZIo@jntp> <verhk3.8hc.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <vercq4$2pume$3@dont-email.me> <verqdl.cc.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <vermho$2s0fg$1@dont-email.me> <veu022.fpc.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <qi8Mvs7XQRtYgiqOGcexAmH2ARc@jntp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net /dO+XnibpJhMLTPwXboGwQTZR8A1Ghug6Sfcdswz3aBA8N7ogd
X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:JcvXYrMdfOQFzrVIjJ9jtwKDe0c= sha256:ECu6PcDKwOo6dDEm72WuUdvhL6TfBlJrD/lnjpotjFk=
User-Agent: tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-10.0-WOW/2.8.0(0.309/5/3) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2
Bytes: 3061

Eric M <conanospamic@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le 18/10/2024 à 15:49, Frank Slootweg a écrit :
> 
> >   If so, as I said, you should have chosen a different 'opponent'. *The
> > OP* is the one who wants "official censorship" to be carried out by the
> > i2pn2 admin,
> 
> No. It's hard not to reply when what I say is constantly twisted. I only 
> want two accounts to be destroyed, for technical reasons (I may say also 
> for technical reasons, but the netiquette seems to be completely ignored 
> now).

  You've shown no "technical reasons" for getting these accounts deleted.

  If you think you have, then explain *which* "technical reasons" you
think are valid reasons to get these accounts deleted. And no more
vagueries, just verifiable facts.

  As to "netiquette seems to be completely ignored", that may be true
and may be bad/sad, but on unmoderated Usenet, you can do little about
it, other than filtering/ignoring it. (See a pattern there!?)

>       I could give you another account on i2pn2 which supports Hezbollah, 
> but no technical abuse, so I don't say anything. 
> 
> I'm sorry this thread got so long, but many trolls, french and US, came to 
> bash me.

   Maybe some of them are trolls, but most of them are not. They are
 people telling you that you should not censor and most of all not order
 others to do your censoring for you.

>	   If you want to talk calmly my mail is valid as is. And I don't 
> think something else important was discussed here before, but I'm not for 
> flooding, so let's end this.

  Huh!? My response was to Adam. It's fine that you respond to my text,
but then don't blame me for dragging out (your "flooding") the thread.

> (For the "nazi" part it was a mail three months ago, in France you can't 
> quote a mail without the approval of the person who wrote it, but it's ok, 
> he could even file a complaint against me but then I would produce what 
> comes out of his server.)

  <firmly sitting on hands>