Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Subject: Re: Inspired by Chris's HMAC cipher
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 13:43:56 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <veuhad$3f8dl$2@dont-email.me>
References: <d362d3df17bfa32425c931d333a3a53be0c31bd0@i2pn2.org>
 <ve1fqq$1r205$1@dont-email.me>
 <e21b4f8f4c4c60ee76caf01ad8b5a13a329ad51b@i2pn2.org>
 <3fdb83dbfe35a57d62d07ea352ccc53a9b6e01cf@i2pn2.org>
 <4742d35c14f5b945a681c331e6661d57e8bb8b96@i2pn2.org>
 <verr74$2stfq$2@dont-email.me>
 <7e059f0438e1e4be5778f2d7f83b8a94202a2149@i2pn2.org>
 <vesa0l$2v6q6$2@dont-email.me>
 <2894de1054fe9a8e4af84661b76d8b7d0cbd0e7b@i2pn2.org>
 <veu7qe$3dg3q$1@dont-email.me> <veucd4$3ee7f$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 22:43:57 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f276c36720a0a7a49bc7397de7896a56";
	logging-data="3645877"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19CR8XQR6BCS/bTQbG4MQhT1rl6Zp8+ozU="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ERgWPbDDHkkCMA01HYzSukBXZbI=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <veucd4$3ee7f$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2704

On 10/18/2024 12:20 PM, Rich wrote:
> Chris M. Thomasson <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 10/18/2024 6:38 AM, Stefan Claas wrote:
>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>> On 10/17/2024 1:25 PM, Stefan Claas wrote:
>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>>>> Yeah, I am only representing the ciphertext in hex right now for the
>>>>>> online version. Now, I could modify it to encode the ciphetext in base
>>>>>> 64 or something a little more "dense", so to speak... Fwiw, here is a
>>>>>> link to a C based test version, have you seen it yet?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.c/c/a53VxN8cwkY/m/XKl1-0a8DAAJ

Bart and I got it to work on many different compilers in that thread.




>>>>>>
>>>>>> ;^)
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I remember that and I had compiler errors.
>>>>
>>>> You never got it compile with C99?
>>>
>>> I tried with gcc and g++, but it is ok.
>>
>> Well, what errors did you get? Many others were able to compile and run
>> it wrt encrypt and decrypt cycles on various plaintexts.
> 
> No makefile, so whether one gets C99 mode depends on what compiler
> version is being used, and upon whether they thought to explicitly
> indicate a version to compile against.
>