Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: End Of Windows On ARM?
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 00:38:59 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <veuv32$3hnnq$2@dont-email.me>
References: <e7t4hjd9g410aq187jt1mhgrt7tg460qlc@4ax.com>
	<lnfqf3Fog9vU2@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 02:38:59 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a453bbc463183db415e6f5e189a8da42";
	logging-data="3727098"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18sWy8ofmzvY6w0hPrLuzXm"
User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:7IqyHWmICI5nYGL2uV77OmvzIaA=
Bytes: 1551

On 18 Oct 2024 19:15:47 GMT, rbowman wrote:

> RT on Arm failed in part because developers were
> skeptical and didn't jump on the new platform. This time around MS made
> sure the emulator can run standard Windows programs (Wine, anyone) and
> Qualcomm pushed out a relatively cheap development system to attract
> people working on native apps.

Unfortunately, running the existing Windows programs isn’t enough, you 
have to offer some advantage to doing so on these Qualcomm-ARM-based 
machines. And so far, there is none.