Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vev398$1r4v5$2@paganini.bofh.team> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!nntp.comgw.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail From: antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded Subject: Re: Diagnostics Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 01:50:34 -0000 (UTC) Organization: To protect and to server Message-ID: <vev398$1r4v5$2@paganini.bofh.team> References: <veekcp$9rsj$1@dont-email.me> <veuggc$1l5eo$1@paganini.bofh.team> <77k5hjprfq0ipjp6pcdd03lnph1i76ssuu@4ax.com> <veunj9$3gbqs$2@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 01:50:34 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="1938405"; posting-host="WwiNTD3IIceGeoS5hCc4+A.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A"; User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20221225 ("Pittyvaich") (Linux/6.1.0-9-amd64 (x86_64)) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3 Bytes: 2389 Lines: 31 Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote: > On 10/18/2024 2:42 PM, George Neuner wrote: > >> To ensure 100% >> functionality at all times effectively requires use of redundant >> hardware - which generally is too expensive for a non safety critical >> device. > > Apparently, there is noise about incorporating such hardware into > *automotive* designs (!). I would have thought the time between > POSTs would have rendered that largely ineffective. OTOH, if > you imagine a failure can occur ANY time, then "just after > putting the car in gear" is as good (bad!) a time as any! TI for several years has nice processors with two cores, which are almost in sync, but one is something like one cycle behind the other. And there is circuitry to compare that both cores produce the same result. This does not cover failures of the whole chip, but dramaticaly lowers chance of undetected erros due to some transient condition. For critical functions a car could have 3 processors with voting circuitry. With separate chips this would be more expensive than single processor, but increase of cost probably would be negligible compared to cost of the whole car. And when integrated on a single chip cost difference would be tiny. IIUC car controller may "reboot" during a ride. Intead of rebooting it could handle work to a backup controller. -- Waldek Hebisch