Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vevq4t$3q0lv$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit
 fractions? (infinitary)
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 01:20:44 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <vevq4t$3q0lv$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org> <vejmkm$e069$1@solani.org>
 <eb21591a-a60a-4baf-bdbd-afef2a69c230@att.net> <vejte9$e3ds$1@solani.org>
 <53460f91-4542-4a92-bc4b-833c2ad61e52@att.net> <ventec$255vi$2@dont-email.me>
 <venunr$2533b$4@dont-email.me> <29ce40e9-f18a-44d4-84d9-23e587cf9dea@att.net>
 <veor6u$2asus$1@dont-email.me> <2b6f9104-a927-49ee-9cf0-6ee3f82edc23@att.net>
 <verkkk$2r6kk$1@dont-email.me> <verlk6$4dv$1@news.muc.de>
 <vermdv$2s24h$1@dont-email.me> <verv6f$2oo0$1@news.muc.de>
 <e4d00f83-42df-4f14-a007-4a90f3b5d644@tha.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 10:20:45 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7e7585e2b1fd89460481779f0d910934";
	logging-data="3998399"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+wv85H311f70/1HxXg5ki8UMnejCelcLo="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EN3U6eMaC58iTCrwfLLAF7OP5+A=
In-Reply-To: <e4d00f83-42df-4f14-a007-4a90f3b5d644@tha.de>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2353

On 10/19/2024 1:10 AM, WM wrote:
> On 17.10.2024 23:22, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>> WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> wrote:
> 
>>> If you can't understand or don't believe, then there is no common basis
>>> for discussion.
>>
>> It's not a matter of belief.  It's a matter of correct and rigorous
>> mathematics.
> 
> When doubling natural numbers we obtain even numbers which have not been 
> doubled.

Oh boy... Wow. Name just one of them? lol.

{ 1*2, 2*2, 3*2, 4*2, 5*2, ... }



> 
> This is a sentence that every mathematician can understand. It is true 
> because the interval covered by the doubled numbers is twice as large as 
> the interval covered by the numbers t be doubled.
> 
> Regards, WM
>