Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 12:05:48 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 64
Message-ID: <vf004q$3qve2$1@dont-email.me>
References: <db18709b6ba689b9c07245000ff1b094@www.novabbs.com>
 <EgMPO.1766243$4J12.285784@fx12.ams4>
 <670ffed7$1$32085$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
 <2fcf10d29b40e102861392bbb5f1cb0c@www.novabbs.com>
 <6712b99d$0$12930$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
 <788c11c48cd3bd847cf3812e2bd0fe2c@www.novabbs.com>
 <1f1b6e5f22e115b849ed4dc6fb087e8e@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 12:03:07 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f1cf0e6f978e960f15f8d074b05686db";
	logging-data="4029890"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19b5l08Qy1nMswCgE7lU2cp"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5v6OLfqV2JJSfFQ35LWEFx9zfQg=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <1f1b6e5f22e115b849ed4dc6fb087e8e@www.novabbs.com>

Den 19.10.2024 02:13, skrev rhertz:
> I want to highlight some "relativistic assertions" about Shapiro's
> delay, so the idiot relativists that support this crap may enter in
> reason:
> 
> 1. For Venus: over a distance of more than 260 million Km (Earth and
> Venus on opposite side of the Sun), being that light takes about 867
> seconds for a 1-Way trip, a Shapiro's delay of about 150 usec MAKES
> SENSE for space navigation. This is a difference of about 4.3 ppm in the
> transit.
> 
> 
> WHO CARES? WHAT IS A VALID SCIENTIFIC ASSERTION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF
> THIS ALLEGED DELAY, WHEN SPACE NAVIGATION IS BASED ON MUCH MORE SERIOUS
> AND REAL FORMULAE, ALGORITHMS AND REAL TIME ONBOARD TRAJECTORY
> PROCESSING?
> 
> Only to show that GR is a real thing? IMBECILES.
> 
> 2. If there is no alignment of planets in such a way that they are on a
> line of sight VERY FAR FROM SUN'S SURFACE, the alleged delay fall 10
> times, and the "error" is then about 0.43 ppm. DO YOU UNDERSTAND HOW
> IMBECILES ARE IN BELIEVING THAT THIS IS IMPORTANT?
> 
> 3. Making things worse, enter the French people, stealing data from
> HIPPARCOS and claiming that they resolved the REAL POSITION of hundred
> of stars with precision in the order of tens of micro-arcseconds.
> 
> WHO, IN ITS SANE STATE OF MIND, CAN AFFIRM THAT THIS HIPPARCOS HOAX HAS
> THE LEAST PRACTICAL VALUE?
> 
> And all of the above, so relativists can claim that GR works?
> 
> 
> INSANE PEOPLE, IDIOT PEOPLE, IGNORANT PEOPLE, USELESS PEOPLE, ETC.
> And worse, these "scientists" make a good living standard BY STEALING
> MONEY from Universities, government funds, etc.
> 
> They are PARASITES OF SCIENCE. They CONTRIBUTE IN NOTHING to the
> advancement of REAL SCIENCE, which makes a path clear for new
> technological solutions.
> 
> 
> Remember: USELESS SCIENCE PARASITES THAT DON'T WORTH THE AIR THEY
> BREATHE.
> 
> 
> 
> And that is the REAL HOAX about GR: LEACHES STEALING VALID RESOURCES TO
> PRODUCE NOTHING, PROTECTING BETWEEN THEMSELVES AGAINST OPPOSITION, AND
> DEFENDING THE CHICKEN THAT THEY STEAL FROM WHO REALLY NEED IT, DEVOURING
> IT FOR FREE (SARCASM HERE).
> 
> THE HOAX IS TO CLAIM THAT WORKS IN THIS LINE OF DOING HAVE ANY MERIT.

Beautiful, Richard!

Nobody can demonstrate the stupidity of Richard Hertz better than you!


-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/