Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vf02kn$3dfm8$1@news.xmission.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!xmission!nnrp.xmission!.POSTED.shell.xmission.com!not-for-mail
From: gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
Subject: Re: Different variable assignments
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 10:45:43 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: The official candy of the new Millennium
Message-ID: <vf02kn$3dfm8$1@news.xmission.com>
References: <lmt83dFsvbvU3@mid.individual.net> <lmta1jFsvc0U1@mid.individual.net> <vecl6n$d0r$1@dont-email.me> <vecmp3$pur$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 10:45:43 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.xmission.com; posting-host="shell.xmission.com:166.70.8.4";
	logging-data="3587784"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@xmission.com"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
Bytes: 1746
Lines: 17

In article <vecmp3$pur$1@dont-email.me>,
Lawrence D'Oliveiro  <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 03:59:49 +0200, Janis Papanagnou wrote:
>
>> ... use bash-specifics like 'coproc' ...
>
>It isn't bash-specific.

People on these newsgroups often use phrases like "bash specific" as
synonyms for "Not strictly POSIX" (*), even though the bash feature under
discussion is also found in other shells.  In fact, many bash-isms,
including "coproc", came originally from ksh.  I'm sure Janis knows this.

-- 
The key difference between faith and science is that in science, evidence that
doesn't fit the theory tends to weaken the theory (that is, make it less likely to
be believed), whereas in faith, contrary evidence just makes faith stronger (on
the assumption that Satan is testing you - trying to make you abandon your faith).